Beginner's GH1 Questions?

Am I right in thinking if I employ the GH13 hack I can log and transfer into FC, then start editing right away?

It's a while since I used FCE because everything I do is in FCP nowadays. The last FCE version I had was (I think) 3.5, so take what I say about FCE4 with a pinch of salt. I can tell you how it is in FCP, but assuming FCE4 was a superset of FCE3.5 and a subset of FCP you should be OK.

Shooting in AVCHD requires you to use the Log & Transfer dialog. In that dialog you can generally preview the footage and set in/out points if you don't want the entire clip. Alternatively select everything and import it all :). Once it's been transferred you are ready to edit. Note that if you want to backup the footage from the card (actually the PRIVATE folder and everything within it) before importing it to FCE then you need to copy the entire card to a folder on your hard disk because FCE uses the entire folder structure to validate the footage prior to import. If you didn't copy the entire card then FCE will refuse to import and you will need to find a third party tool to transcode for you (e.g. Toast 10).

Shooting in MJPEG is a little different. Unlike AVCHD, the footage shot in MJPEG is not placed in the PRIVATE folder on the card, but is instead placed in the DCIM folder along with the stills. In this case you can drag the .mov files directly to your hard disk and start editing. There are advantages and disadvantages to both methods. The advantage of shooting MJPEG is that you don't have to go through the Log & Transfer process, but the files are quite a bit larger in the first place.

I'm in PAL land and have a PAL GH-1. Is there anything I should set up in FC, session set up or FC preference,s to work with the best quality files, and what would my best quality final output format be, something I can view personally and upload to Vimeo?

I am also in PAL. I usually Log & Transfer to ProRes 422, but I don't think you have that in FCE4 (I could be wrong), so you will probably be using AIC (Apple Intermediate Codec), which is still generally very good, but the files are a little larger (in terms of MB) than ProRes.

If you are always going to be shooting in the same mode (1080 vs 720) then by all means set up your preferences to always be in a mode that matches. I don't always have that luxury, so I set mine up on-the-fly as needed.

Create a sequence that matches the footage, so if you shoot in 1920x1080 @ 25p then create a sequence that is 1920x1080 @ 25p. If you are shooting at 50i then create a sequence that is 50i. If you are shooting 1280x720 @ 50p then your sequence should be 1280x720 @ 50p. Simples :)

I can't remember if FCE does this or not, but I normally create a new sequence in FCP and don't worry about what the settings are, because when I drop the first clip on to the sequence in FCP it automatically warns me if the sequence and clips don't match and asks if I want to change the sequence to match the clip (answer = yes). With this in mind I normally don't need to manually set sequences or touch the preferences at all.

In terms of viewing yourself, it depends on the device you are viewing on, and how you are editing. If your screen is at least 1920x1080 then by all means shoot and view in 1080. Don't sit too close or you will notice artifacts! If you are looking for action shots or the ability to slow footage down during editing then shoot in 720/50p. This is by far my most used mode, but then I'm not trying to be the next cinematic hot shot. Others prefer to shoot 1080/24p because they are trying to target 'the cinematic look' more. In this case you will need to check how the Log & Transfer window is handling things. FCP removes pull-down automatically. I'm not sure what FCE4 does.

I normally upload to Vimeo using an H264 codec @ 1280x720 25p. This does two things. Transcoding from 50p to 25p halves the file size I am uploading and converting to H264 makes it much smaller too (typically 10% of the original size) without much loss in quality. I do notice a small colour shift when I do this, but only when you view the footage side by side. Most people would never notice it. I typically leave the keyframes set to 25 but this is something you can experiment with based on the action in your footage.
 
Thanks.

Yeah, I think FCE has moved on a bit, which is partly why I went with that rather than FCP at this stage.
Still, your advice is greatly appreciated. :dankk2:
 
I was going to make a new thread but might as well conserve space and ask it here: is there any FREE software someone can point me to that de interlaces the pulldown on avchd in 1080 24p? I know about Neoscene and Edius and such but they are very expensive and I plan to do the hack eventually to have native 24p so I don't want to spend that much $ on software I will only need for a while. So for the meantime is there anything I can download that can do this for me? I've looked everywhere and find nothing but dead links to trash spam sites
 
as for Canon FD, what is that? I mean as compared to the 'newer lenses' you mention. Is the "FD" line from SLR's as opposed to DSLR and if so, is there any difference or quality lost? I see a canon FD 50mm 1.8 for only 30-40$ on ebay. How is that possible...must be crappy, no? Why are they all so cheap....30-50$ max it seems lol.

Don't make the mistake of equating lens price with quality. Canon FD lenses are excellent lenses and were for many years the top lenses on the market. The reason why they're generally cheap (and were for the most part MUCH cheaper before the m4/3 format came out) is because the FD is a dead format, so there's not much demand for those lenses. Low demand + large supply = low price. FD was replaced by EOS when Canon went with modern auto-focus camera systems.

At the opposite side of the spectrum, there are many expensive lenses that aren't all that great, but they're expensive because either it's a living format (i.e. one that's still in use), or because they're rare lenses and only a few were made (or both).

It's best to do your own research into what you consider to be good image quality from all these lenses, because only you can be the final judge on what makes a good lens. Places like Flickr are a great source to find sample photos of pretty much any lens imaginable.
 
Wow that's awesome...what a boon to DSLR owners. Just ordered mine from ebay...50$ bucks for a 50mm canon f1.4 ...that's great. Can't wait.

Do any of you have some recommendations for good FD lenses to look out for? like I said just got the 50mm 1.4, what else should I look for?
 
Wow that's awesome...what a boon to DSLR owners. Just ordered mine from ebay...50$ bucks for a 50mm canon f1.4 ...that's great. Can't wait.

Do any of you have some recommendations for good FD lenses to look out for? like I said just got the 50mm 1.4, what else should I look for?

If you can pick up a copy of the FL 55/1.2 you'll love it. It's one of the most popular lens 5D2 owners convert for video use because of the stepless aperture control, and on the GH1 it makes for an awesome portrait lens for stills (it's also a nice, fast video lens). Other good FD/FL lenses are the FD 24/2, FD 35/2 SSC (concave element version), the FD 50/3.5 macro, 85/1.2, 135/2.5, and others. I think the FL 19/3.5 might make for a good video lens as well, but I don't have that one yet.
 
Back
Top