Mitch_Ives
Well-known member
bena said:Opcode, is there any chance you could open up your foxy and take some pics? I would really like to know how it works so us DIY guys can make ourselves one. ;')
Thanks
Ben
I think this post should be removed.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
bena said:Opcode, is there any chance you could open up your foxy and take some pics? I would really like to know how it works so us DIY guys can make ourselves one. ;')
Thanks
Ben
Tom McKay said:Opcode,
This is Tom from VariZoom. With all due respect you really need to do some more investigating. I wish you would before you say anymore about VariZoom especially since you have not yet used the VariZoom.
It is "a significant step up" I think you would need to actually compare the two products to make that statement.
You said the $465. Fox is a low cost alternative. My VariZoom PFI is $199.
JesterJJZ said:As a user of both Varizoom and Bebob products, it's easy for me to say that the Zoe and Foxi are far far superior to their Varizoom counterparts. Varizoom makes some great stuff for their "pro" line, but their Pannasonic offerings fall short IMHO.
Mr. Blonde said:After using the Foxi for a shoot, both my AC and I love it!. I swear to you that unless using a 35 adapter with the HVX, all you'd need for focus pulling is the Bebob Foxi, forget a mechanical follow focus unit. On a recent music video we used the Foxi for multiple stationary and steadicam rack shots and the Foxi was spot on in every shot!
Mr. Blonde said:My only complaint about the Foxi is the lack of a record button and the Iris belt is a bit too stiff.
While the focus is controlled via the nice and large 270 degree knob, the iris is controlled by a belt system that feels too stiff. So if you plan on iris pulling, it may be a bit difficult to do so.
Barry_Green said:Don't know that I'm too impressed with the iris conveyer-belt design, but the focus system on the shipping unit was very pleasant.
darwinandpaine said:However, I agree with Barry about the iris "treadmill/conveyor belt." It feels really funky when you have to go from full open all the way to the f16. I don't know how often anyone needs to do that, but it kinda felt cheezy. If I weren't set on getting an M2, I'd buy one in a second, but it would be useless with a 35mm adapter.
Barry_Green said:Is it a complete replacement for the "real" follow focus? No, because if you want to use it with a mini35/M2/Cinemek/Letus type adapter, and want to use a follow focus on the 35mm lens, the Foxi has no applicability for that job. Only a manual follow focus could be used in that circumstance.
Barry_Green said:I prefer the iris control on the Varizoom. I prefer the focus control on the Foxi, and the markable wheel is nice. I think the connectors on both of 'em are unsatisfactory; I'd rather see a molded plastic block that snaps in rather than trying to wrangle two 90-degree plugs into a space that's not really big enough for just one.
Pierre co bebob said:Hello,
as you see in the account name, we are the manufacturer of Foxi. I guess that you enjoy that different manufacturers put efforts, money and time in developping innovative products. They will do it only as long as they can hope to come back on their investment.
I respect that you would like to make such a controller on your own.
Don´t you think it would be a much better way to ask panasonic about the informations you need, than trying to copy what other people made?
Regards,
pierre
Search the old articles, somebody (maybe even Jarred?) made their own zoom controller and published the pieces.bena said:My guess is the Panny is expecting a pulsed signal like a R/C servo. But thats only a guess.
I will see if Jan can point me in the right direction to find this information out.