Be careful using tripods. The GH1's ( and GH13's) Achilles heel!

reggietelly

Active member
I wanted to come up with a suitably inflammatory title so people would have a look at this because I think it is very important.

I have posted a video on Vimeo that I'd like people to take a look at. It illustrates what I think is a big problem with the AVCHD codec and is further to the pulsing problem noted elsewhere.

http://vimeo.com/15583689

Actually the Vimeo version still shows the problems so you will see them even at 1280x720. For a the full 1920x1080 picture please download the original. It's not too large at 60 Mb or so.

So I am having a huge problem with AVCHD footage. Although the hack has without a doubt made the camera better with moving footage, I think I have found it's Achilles heel and it is to do with tripods and locking the camera down.

I have shot 2 nearly identical scenes one with the camera on a tripod and then I have taken the GH1 off the tripod and just held the camera steadily on the same scene. The difference to my eyes at least is astounding. I am using lpowells 40Mbps AVCHD High Reliability Patch. I think a better test might be to actually try hand held then set the camera into the tripod since that would really show how locking the camera starts to introduce these artefacts on an identical scene.

Now this testing was essentially to do with working out the strobing issue or pulsing that is well documented around the forum. I have a feeling that the first shot might be slightly underexposed.

I first noticed the pulsing on the side of the tv. This is really noticeable and generates a very distracting boiling effect that is hard to not look at once you see it. I think 5DtoRGB does a pretty good job of masking this but it is still there.

But after I did the hand held test, I realised looking at the whole of the frame that overall detail had been compromised by putting the GH1 on the tripod. In particular look at the difference between the AKG headphones where there is a dotted grill. In the handheld this is pretty neatly resolved, but is not evident in the tripod one. Also the black leather strap has the pulsing or boiling and lacks detail, whereas the moving shot shows much greater clarity and no pulsing. Remember this same lens, same hack. Yes there is pulsing in the background of the hand held shot but that's much more of an exposure problem, and could be addressed using 5DtoRGB's better transcoding in my opinion.

The point I am making with this is, it's not about the hack or bitrate. It is just that the AVCHD codec and it's long GOP frames really screw up the picture when you lock the camera off. It makes large assumptions and to my eye it appears that you lose a great deal of detail. This could be anything that exhibits a uniform pattern in the background of an interview say and it could be perfectly exposed! Am I the only one seeing this or are we so enamoured of this camera and the constant search for the highest bitrate that we choose not to see it? I think this area is the one where for me this camera falls a bit flat.

To me this is pretty worrying, and anyone shooting interviews on tripods should really look at this.

Also I'd like it if other people could test because it is such an easy thing to do. Again this isn't about bitrate or hacks or low light, it is about one of the fundamental accessories we use with a camera.

all the best

Richard

Maybe I was a little hasty. I have tried some other tests and have been able to replicate it slightly but not to the degree of the first clip so I am a bit worried the first shot may have been a tad underexposed. Still doesn't explain the side of the TV boiling.The killer is underexposure I think as this tends to mute the colours to such an extent that they become hard for the codec to discern hence the mud. So bit of back peddling but still not convinced.
 
Last edited:
I can't say I've noticed any problems with my tripod footage.... which is pretty much everything I've done so far. I'm not a professional and probably not as analytical as you.
The first shot (tripod) looks darker than the hand held section though. Unfair test?
 
Unfair test?

Yes I am beginning to think so but I can't get away from the pulsing side of the TV. And anyway you should be able to underexpose by a few stops to stop hilights blowing out I feel.
 
Unfair test?

Yes I am beginning to think so but I can't get away from the pulsing side of the TV. And anyway you should be able to underexpose by a few stops to stop hilights blowing out I feel.

What camera mode are you shooting in? I'm guessing you're shooting video with your camera in either A-priority or M, with manual shooting mode enabled in-menu with the hack. I noticed the same artifacts you describe when shooting video in these modes, and it was eliminated - not reduced, but totally eliminated - by shooting in Creative Movie mode with manual mode enabled in-menu.

I had dismissed Creative Movie mode once the hack began enabling manual video control, but IMO it really does give the best and cleanest output, especially if you're using manual glass so you can set aperture on the lens itself and ignore that silly "peripheral defocus" feature.

If you're not shooting in Creative Movie mode, give it another try. You should see an absence of the artifacts you describe, tripod or not.
 
I downloaded the strobing test video and played it back using Quicktime on a 1080p monitor. I noticed the frame rate is 25fps, indicating a PAL GH1, which shouldn't pose any problems for the High Reliability Patch.

Sorry, but I really don't see any significant pulsing in the static tripod clip, it looks as good as I'd expect. The handheld clip had natural variations in encoding artifacts that I'd likewise expect from camera vibration.

The 720p Vimeo video did have a bit of pulsing, but this may be due to interaction between the original 1080p25 frame rate and the format that Vimeo transcodes it into.
 
i dont see the obvious pulsing, just dancing artifacts from darker saturated areas, i see it sometimes in my lowlight footage. were both exposed the same cause they dont look it.
 
What camera mode are you shooting in? I'm guessing you're shooting video with your camera in either A-priority or M, with manual shooting mode enabled in-menu with the hack. I noticed the same artifacts you describe when shooting video in these modes, and it was eliminated - not reduced, but totally eliminated - by shooting in Creative Movie mode with manual mode enabled in-menu.

I had dismissed Creative Movie mode once the hack began enabling manual video control, but IMO it really does give the best and cleanest output, especially if you're using manual glass so you can set aperture on the lens itself and ignore that silly "peripheral defocus" feature.

If you're not shooting in Creative Movie mode, give it another try. You should see an absence of the artifacts you describe, tripod or not.

No this is all Creative movie mode. I never use anything else.
 
I am beginning to think this was more an exposure issue, but I continue to push the fact that there are some times when you need to underexpose a scene slightly to avoid over bright hilights. As you do this then these artefacts become a lot more apparent.

I am also looking at the footage very critically. I work in Motion Graphics and so am used to all types of footage. I've seen some ropey material in my time. I've trained my eye I guess to spot any imperfection and things like this leap out at me. I am looking at it from about a foot and a half from an Apple 27 inch monitor! This distance really shows up a clips flaws.

But for me at least I think the answer lies in 5DtoRGB which I feel adds enough grain to mask these slight imperfections. Also it yeilds a flatter image from which you have a lot more latitude to grade. Again I really am looking at this far too closely and maybe am losing the plot a little!
 
Last edited:
Hi People. Check out this example that I took to illustrate the issue:

http://www.lovespiral.com/shirt_strobe.mov

I enlarged the footage by 200% so you can't miss it. The blue shirt displays this "pulsing" and I find it somewhat distracting.

I had my camera on a tripod, I always use creative movie mode set to full manual. I have tried a number of the different AVCHD hacks and I still get this behavior.
 
I downloaded the strobing test video and played it back using Quicktime on a 1080p monitor. I noticed the frame rate is 25fps, indicating a PAL GH1, which shouldn't pose any problems for the High Reliability Patch.

Sorry, but I really don't see any significant pulsing in the static tripod clip, it looks as good as I'd expect. The handheld clip had natural variations in encoding artifacts that I'd likewise expect from camera vibration.

The 720p Vimeo video did have a bit of pulsing, but this may be due to interaction between the original 1080p25 frame rate and the format that Vimeo transcodes it into.

Hi there

first thanks for the patch. I was not disparaging your work at all but merely pointing out the rather annoying issue of this goddam pulsing.

In Final Cut the pulsing isn't so apparent on my JVC Pro LCD grading monitor, but it is there.
It is more apparent if you view on a computer monitor through Quicktime. If you look specifically at the side of the TV in the tripod shot, that's what's driving me kind of crazy.

I also have footage I shot today where there is grass in the foreground in shadow that is definitely back to the dreaded mud. It is blurred and pulses in stark contrast to the surrounding lit grass. The exposure for the scene factors in the sky which being bright means that the exposure needs to be offset a few notches to the left.

I think the tripod thing was a little premature but I am still battling how the GH1 AVCHD deals with underexposed areas. This just doesn't happen with MJPEG.
 
Hi People. Check out this example that I took to illustrate the issue:

http://www.lovespiral.com/shirt_strobe.mov

I enlarged the footage by 200% so you can't miss it. The blue shirt displays this "pulsing" and I find it somewhat distracting.

I had my camera on a tripod, I always use creative movie mode set to full manual. I have tried a number of the different AVCHD hacks and I still get this behavior.

Have you tried running that tshirt shot through 5DtoRGB. I noticed a huge improvement, but you need to tick Add Noise. It adds a grain to the image prior to decoding. The result for me at least is pretty good and fixed my blurry grass shadows etc.

Obviously not ideal for longform at all but still if you needed to save a shot it could work.

all the best

rich
 
i dont see the obvious pulsing, just dancing artifacts from darker saturated areas, i see it sometimes in my lowlight footage. were both exposed the same cause they dont look it.

MR Fanny

I love your name! I think maybe they weren't the same exposure. But still there's artefacts that just shouldn't be there in my opinion.
 
What lens did you use? Was it a Panasonic lens with stabilization enabled when on the tripod?

When I shot video with a Canon 5D2 on a tripod with IS enabled the jitters and artefacts were pretty bad due to the gyros trying to act against the tripods "stability". I was just wondering the other day if the same is the case for the GH1...must try it out tomorrow.

If the lens you used wasn't stabilized then I can't imagine what the issue could be...
 
Sorry to veer off topic but how do you like editing on the Apple 27"? I need a new monitor for video and photo editing and am dithering between Apple's 27" and Dell's. I far prefer Apple's industrial design and as a Mac user the Force is strong in this one, but the Dell is reportedly more color accurate, calibrated for AdobeRGB at the factory, has a matte screen, and uses CFL backlighting with better color gamut than the Apple's white LEDs. It also works with any decent DVI card, while the Apple needs mini displayport, which means a far more limited pool (none?) of good Nvidia cards.

I just answered my own question, I think. But I do want to hear your thoughts on editing on the Apple monitor, as it's really tempting.

I am looking at it from about a foot and a half from an Apple 27 inch monitor! This distance really shows up a clips flaws.
 
Sorry to veer off topic but how do you like editing on the Apple 27"? I need a new monitor for video and photo editing and am dithering between Apple's 27" and Dell's. I far prefer Apple's industrial design and as a Mac user the Force is strong in this one, but the Dell is reportedly more color accurate, calibrated for AdobeRGB at the factory, has a matte screen, and uses CFL backlighting with better color gamut than the Apple's white LEDs. It also works with any decent DVI card, while the Apple needs mini displayport, which means a far more limited pool (none?) of good Nvidia cards.

I just answered my own question, I think. But I do want to hear your thoughts on editing on the Apple monitor, as it's really tempting.

Sorry I use 2 of the older aluminium monitors, not the 27 inch new ones. I think they are 27" maybe less don't know. I use Color and FCP on my system and it is great over 3 monitors I also have a JVC LCD broadcast monitor at the side to see full res work as it will be broadcast.

I like the old ones because they are matte screens. I sound like a screen junky but I got my second one very cheaply as a refurb. I really don't have a lot of time for the new glossy monitors. They look fantastic but for actual work I'd say you need very low lighting to work seriously with them to minimise reflections.
 
What lens did you use? Was it a Panasonic lens with stabilization enabled when on the tripod?

When I shot video with a Canon 5D2 on a tripod with IS enabled the jitters and artefacts were pretty bad due to the gyros trying to act against the tripods "stability". I was just wondering the other day if the same is the case for the GH1...must try it out tomorrow.

If the lens you used wasn't stabilized then I can't imagine what the issue could be...

Yeah I tried that too. Stabilisation on and off. Low NR, no NR etc. This doesn't change the problem. I think it happens when you get a certain frequency pattern that is underexposed. This is an issue because the codec is variable and it tends to starve a bit when there are low detail areas like flat walls, skies, and under exposed areas.

5DtoRGB really helps overcome this issue although it adds noise that some might find distracting.
 
Hi People,

I just did some more testing around this issue. Here are some findings:

*Issue is present with Stabilization turned off (and it doesn't make it better or worse).

*Issue is worse when scene is underexposed and/or object that is strobing is underexposed or flat.

*Issue is still present even when scene is supposedly properly exposed (according to camera).

*Issue seems to be caused by affected area becoming sharp and then blurry over and over. Inspecting the footage frame by frame shows that the cycle happens about every 30 frames (on 60p footage)

Here is some more footage from this morning's test with my "blue shirt of doom!" :)

http://www.lovespiral.com/shirt2.mov

Note: ISO was turned way up for these shots, but I have seen the issue in low ISO shots as well.

Also, for people who don't want to click my link above, here are two screen shots. The first is during the sharp part of the cycle, and the second is 1 frame later when it goes slightly blurry. Look in the upper right hand corner of the shirt. It isn't an extreme example, but it does show the issue if you look close enough. These are screen shots from the correctly exposed scene:

Sharper:

shirt_sharp.jpg


More Blurry:

shirt_blurry.jpg


-shawn-
 
Last edited:
If you crank ISO on the GH1 you are going to get significant noise, hack or no hack.

If you underexpose GH1 video you are going to get significant noise, hack or no hack.

I don't think this is a codec issue. I think it is simply a GH1 shooting natural light, and the camera, great as it is, simply isn't a 5DII.

I have the same issues with my GF13, frankly even moreso because your camera has better low light performance than mine. I've been around the block on this issue and there just isn't a magic bullet, or even a Magic Bullet plugin. Once you leave ISO100 on these cameras, and especially if you underexpose your video, you are going to see this kind of noise, full stop.

So what I've learned to do is "overexpose" video by the camera's metering standards. Just a tad. You can get a feel for how far you can go over the line. That helps a lot. And I never, ever, ever shoot video above ISO100 anymore. Okay, maybe sometimes I'll go ISO200 if it's dark and I need to get the shot.

Thirdly, I bit the non-magic bullet and bought Neat Video's NR plugin for FCP. $99 but worth every penny if you routinely dump noisy video onto your NLE and you're not willing to pony up for a 5DII. Neat Video actually lets me shoot my GF13 up to ISO800 if I need to -- the end result won't win an Oscar but it's extraordinary how clean the footage looks given how noisy it was raw. Think of it as Lightroom 3's NR except for video. It's that good.

Leave the poor codecs alone. It's not their fault. Let more light in your sensor, stay at ISO100, and if you're still unhappy with the noise, get Neat Video.
 
Re: Noise

Re: Noise

If you crank ISO on the GH1 you are going to get significant noise, hack or no hack.

If you underexpose GH1 video you are going to get significant noise, hack or no hack.

I don't think this is a codec issue. I think it is simply a GH1 shooting natural light, and the camera, great as it is, simply isn't a 5DII.

Leave the poor codecs alone. It's not their fault. Let more light in your sensor, stay at ISO100, and if you're still unhappy with the noise, get Neat Video.

Thanks for the feedback. Just to be clear, I am not talking about noise. I actually don't mind the noise that much and completely expect it at ISO settings above 200 and when there is underexposure.

During my tests I shot both AVCHD and MJPEG. The MPJEG footage does not have this issue and looks great (although it still has some "noise" which isn't an issue for me). That is with identical camera settings.

The issue that I am talking about is a "pulsing" that happens at regular intervals throughout the footage. With the 60p footage it seems to be about every 30 frames. If I advance frame by frame through the footage it looks something like this:
Frame 1 is the blurriest. Frame 2-29 gradually gets sharper. Frame 30 is the sharpest, and then frame 31 goes back to being the blurriest and repeats the pattern. It is the transition between frame 30 and 31 that causes the "pulsing" effect that I am talking about.

I believe this is a less severe version of the issue that happens when shooting hacked AVCHD 60p footage at less than 1/60 shutter speed. In fact, I just took some footage at 1/30 shutter speed and counted the frames. The extreme pulsing follows the exact same pattern as above. Here are two screen shots as evidence:

Frame #1:
frame1.jpg


Frame #30:
frame30.jpg


I personally believe this is a codec issue. It isn't huge and of course I can avoid it mostly by shooting proper exposure and avoiding certain situations, however I shoot a lot of footage in the woods without extra lighting so its hard to avoid this issue at all times. :)

-shawn-
 
Try changing your 60p GOP size in hack to something much lower, like 10 or maybe even less.
It defaults to 30, which is why every 30th frame is sharp.
 
Back
Top