Exact,
I have been doing some research on Blu-ray reliability and trying to separate opinion from quantitative data. Could you tell me what this quote is based on?
"However, it's relatively fragile compared to CD & DVD and is highly susceptible to finger marks cause read problems (more than CD or DVD ever was)."
Is that your opinion or from a documented study. Opinion is OK, nothing wrong with that, I just want to know the source.
Best Regards,
Grant
In addition to videography I have a business that deals with media duplication & archiving systems for CD, DVD and Blu-ray. The statement you quote is based on substantial experience over thousands of discs (probably millions of CDs, hundreds of thousands of DVDs - possibly millions, and tens of thousands of Blu-ray).
Is it a documented study as such? No. Is it an opinion formed by looking at lots of discs (good and bad) and systems logs? Yes. It's also personal experience of using the media.
Grease from finger marks gets on to media without you realising it. Grease that was there prior to recording can be seen as a shadow on the recording surface of the disc (as the laser passes over the grease). If the grease was added after recording there is no shadow. Because of the size of the pits and the density of the data it's much easier to damage a Blu-ray disc than DVD, and DVD is much easier to damage than CD.
Re-Writable media (CD-RW, DVD +/- RW and BD-RE) are even worse because they reflect much less of the laser light back in the first place. Get finger grease on a BD-RE disc and you can say good bye to any hope of reliability. Cleaning it can help (assuming it was added post recording) but don't rely on it.
I've never understood why the general public wanted naked media instead of media in caddies, which was much more reliable than naked media will ever be.