ahalpert
Major Contributor
I shot a wedding yesterday and noticed how both the photographer and I were buzzing around the ceremony, using multiple cameras to cover it from a variety of angles, and I realized that the iPhone will never have a meaningful impact on shooting weddings. Even if it got so good that we were both using iPhones instead, they would still need experienced shooters because you can't reposition the camera in post even if you could reframe, refocus etc.
Plus, when you're spending tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars creating a spectacle, it makes no sense to skimp on its documentation. Just like in narrative film and TV.
I think talking heads is the type of shooting most vulnerable to iPhone replacement because the basic need - a steady, focused, exposed shot of a person - could be handled by an amateur with a really good iPhone with minimal direction. It wont be as good but it will be good enough. And even then there are still documentaries and such with a higher aesthetic bar that will shoot proper interviews with consistent lightings.
So, the bad news is that a lot of talking heads shooting will go away. The good news is that much of that shift has already transpired. I have some clients who shoot a steady stream of web content on their webcams and only call me in for something nice. I've directed remote iPhone interview shoots over Facetime and edited the footage after receiving it through the cloud. You have TV news guests piping in via webcam. I dont think that iPhones are going to make as much further of an impact as some people think, and that's even before discussing the inherent sensitivity advantages of larger sensors and fast lenses.
Additionally - I read a lot of chatter online about how the broader public is underwhelmed by the latest iPhone releases. So, it's possible that Apple will have a diminishing incentive to continue amping up the imaging power.
Plus, when you're spending tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars creating a spectacle, it makes no sense to skimp on its documentation. Just like in narrative film and TV.
I think talking heads is the type of shooting most vulnerable to iPhone replacement because the basic need - a steady, focused, exposed shot of a person - could be handled by an amateur with a really good iPhone with minimal direction. It wont be as good but it will be good enough. And even then there are still documentaries and such with a higher aesthetic bar that will shoot proper interviews with consistent lightings.
So, the bad news is that a lot of talking heads shooting will go away. The good news is that much of that shift has already transpired. I have some clients who shoot a steady stream of web content on their webcams and only call me in for something nice. I've directed remote iPhone interview shoots over Facetime and edited the footage after receiving it through the cloud. You have TV news guests piping in via webcam. I dont think that iPhones are going to make as much further of an impact as some people think, and that's even before discussing the inherent sensitivity advantages of larger sensors and fast lenses.
Additionally - I read a lot of chatter online about how the broader public is underwhelmed by the latest iPhone releases. So, it's possible that Apple will have a diminishing incentive to continue amping up the imaging power.
Last edited:
