Lenilenapi
Carbonite Member
Has anyone tried the old Nikon 50-300 f4.5 with a modern video camera like the F3.
I recently replaced my 80-200 with the Sigma 50- 150 because it is very good glass and also a better zoom ratio for interviews on an F3 . However i'm wondering about keeping the 8-0-200 for lobger shots or even trying the old 50-300 for a really long range.
Its supposed to be sharp , parfocal , & constant aperture and has a longer focus pull , but its heavy though maybe no worse than a red 18-85,
I recently replaced my 80-200 with the Sigma 50- 150 because it is very good glass and also a better zoom ratio for interviews on an F3 . However i'm wondering about keeping the 8-0-200 for lobger shots or even trying the old 50-300 for a really long range.
Its supposed to be sharp , parfocal , & constant aperture and has a longer focus pull , but its heavy though maybe no worse than a red 18-85,

