I know very little about this topic and treatment, but the NIH does fund the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (http://nccam.nih.gov/). Within any established community, there's likely to be some resistance to new ideas. That's normal and healthy. A fair burden of proof must be placed on new treatments.
There are some published articles on antineoplaston therapy (many of them with Burznski as primary author), but I haven't read them. You can peruse the abstracts here. If you want to read the full articles, I may be able to share them with you. I do know that gene-specific drugs are out there and Steve Jobs, for one, received this type of targeted treatment. Those regimens are based on sequencing the cancer's genetic material.
However, I'm somewhat skeptical of any treatment that tries to convince me with a 90 minute documentary. One reputable, peer-reviewed study that yielded dramatic results would make huge waves. Many researchers would scramble to replicate the findings. Maybe some of those articles on PubMed will yield better insight.
There are some published articles on antineoplaston therapy (many of them with Burznski as primary author), but I haven't read them. You can peruse the abstracts here. If you want to read the full articles, I may be able to share them with you. I do know that gene-specific drugs are out there and Steve Jobs, for one, received this type of targeted treatment. Those regimens are based on sequencing the cancer's genetic material.
However, I'm somewhat skeptical of any treatment that tries to convince me with a 90 minute documentary. One reputable, peer-reviewed study that yielded dramatic results would make huge waves. Many researchers would scramble to replicate the findings. Maybe some of those articles on PubMed will yield better insight.