Hi Guys.
I have just acquired a Century 16:9 anamorphic adaptor to try on the NEX 5N. I had to fashion a 49mm thread to allow it to be fitted to my lenses. Now its on I am finding it is performing rather well!. Not tack sharp, but has a filmy sort of softness in a good way I guess.
I have noticed certain lenses work better than others. In particular the sony kit lens works very well when set to around 35mm, performance and sharpness seems to trail off as you move away from the 35mm sweet spot. At 18mm there is a bit of vignetting but zoom in a bit to about 24/28mm and its gone. The smaller the aperture, the sharper the image is.
I would have expected the adaptor to work best at a higher magnification such as 55mm, but this is not the case at all. My third party lenses such as helio 58mmf2 and zuiko 50mmf1.4 cant touch the sharpness of the sony 18-55kit lens even when the apertures are closed to the same point. the helios flares like crazy and almost loses the signature blue line flare. The zuiko is alsmot as bad.
What is it about the sony lens that might be making it work better with the century 16:9 adaptor? As I would like to find a sturdy prime 35mm lens with similar characteristics as that of the sony kit lens 'sel1855' which will be happier to support the added weight.
I would also like some advice on how to get the most from the optex/centure style 16:9 adaptors when used to achieve 2.35:1 format from a 16:9 sensor. I understand the software processing, de-sqeezing, setting frame size in premier etc., but id like some help on how to select suitable prime lenses to obtain best perfromance from this comact a cheap anamorphic adaptor...
ps. I paid 20.00gbp for the adaptor from a nice guy in london! I thought that was a pretty good price
I have just acquired a Century 16:9 anamorphic adaptor to try on the NEX 5N. I had to fashion a 49mm thread to allow it to be fitted to my lenses. Now its on I am finding it is performing rather well!. Not tack sharp, but has a filmy sort of softness in a good way I guess.
I have noticed certain lenses work better than others. In particular the sony kit lens works very well when set to around 35mm, performance and sharpness seems to trail off as you move away from the 35mm sweet spot. At 18mm there is a bit of vignetting but zoom in a bit to about 24/28mm and its gone. The smaller the aperture, the sharper the image is.
I would have expected the adaptor to work best at a higher magnification such as 55mm, but this is not the case at all. My third party lenses such as helio 58mmf2 and zuiko 50mmf1.4 cant touch the sharpness of the sony 18-55kit lens even when the apertures are closed to the same point. the helios flares like crazy and almost loses the signature blue line flare. The zuiko is alsmot as bad.
What is it about the sony lens that might be making it work better with the century 16:9 adaptor? As I would like to find a sturdy prime 35mm lens with similar characteristics as that of the sony kit lens 'sel1855' which will be happier to support the added weight.
I would also like some advice on how to get the most from the optex/centure style 16:9 adaptors when used to achieve 2.35:1 format from a 16:9 sensor. I understand the software processing, de-sqeezing, setting frame size in premier etc., but id like some help on how to select suitable prime lenses to obtain best perfromance from this comact a cheap anamorphic adaptor...
ps. I paid 20.00gbp for the adaptor from a nice guy in london! I thought that was a pretty good price