lordofmetropolis
Member
Ladies and Gentlemen,
I know that Panasonic's AG-LA7200 Anamorphic adaptor is the only the thing in the market. This adaptor at times makes me wish I purchased a Canon XL2. Has anybody found the following things to be annoying with the adaptor:
1. The way it mounts onto the lens. You just keep turning it and turning it and turning it....it really never seats into the lens the way a UV or any filter would. Sure you got that little tightening knob, but it still never seats as secure as I'd like it to.
2. This leads to question 2....focusing. At times, when I am at the long range of the lens, there is focus fringing going on. I can't get acceptable focus. Now, I swear I am mounting this lens properly....and I know its a lot of glass to have on our lenses, but just wanted to see if anybody noticed this.
3. That leads to part 3......if I am shooting for TV, I can probably sacrifice this 16:9 conversion lens adaptor and just use the natural glass that is already present.
There are some great things about this little DVX-100A. I shoot a lot with Sony's D-35 and 600 (both betacams) and Sony's HD F900 (depending which network) However, these other cameras lack a simple feature that can be really really sweet: the little LCD screen. Sure, I love shooting with the other cameras that don't have it, but having an LCD screen allows me to execute a shot within seconds, and at the same time, see the entire framing for it. Its a great feature.
I saw the comparison video that Jared put together (thank you Jared) It leads me to believe that the DVX-100A is great for 24p in terms of color interpretation.....granted, thats a "loaded" statement...but I like Panasonic's interpretation of color. The DVX has a great look if one's final look is to be on TV (it gives the film look for TV) I am beginning to conclude that I would only need to use the anamorphic adaptor if I want to go to film.....otherwise, I say skip the anamorphic adaptor if your final source is video, because the anamorphic adaptor is a lot of glass to deal with and could f*#ck up the focus. I saw the anamorphic adaptor index, great idea.....BUT, lets face it, still a pain. Wondering if anybody else had similar thoughts.
THANKS!
I know that Panasonic's AG-LA7200 Anamorphic adaptor is the only the thing in the market. This adaptor at times makes me wish I purchased a Canon XL2. Has anybody found the following things to be annoying with the adaptor:
1. The way it mounts onto the lens. You just keep turning it and turning it and turning it....it really never seats into the lens the way a UV or any filter would. Sure you got that little tightening knob, but it still never seats as secure as I'd like it to.
2. This leads to question 2....focusing. At times, when I am at the long range of the lens, there is focus fringing going on. I can't get acceptable focus. Now, I swear I am mounting this lens properly....and I know its a lot of glass to have on our lenses, but just wanted to see if anybody noticed this.
3. That leads to part 3......if I am shooting for TV, I can probably sacrifice this 16:9 conversion lens adaptor and just use the natural glass that is already present.
There are some great things about this little DVX-100A. I shoot a lot with Sony's D-35 and 600 (both betacams) and Sony's HD F900 (depending which network) However, these other cameras lack a simple feature that can be really really sweet: the little LCD screen. Sure, I love shooting with the other cameras that don't have it, but having an LCD screen allows me to execute a shot within seconds, and at the same time, see the entire framing for it. Its a great feature.
I saw the comparison video that Jared put together (thank you Jared) It leads me to believe that the DVX-100A is great for 24p in terms of color interpretation.....granted, thats a "loaded" statement...but I like Panasonic's interpretation of color. The DVX has a great look if one's final look is to be on TV (it gives the film look for TV) I am beginning to conclude that I would only need to use the anamorphic adaptor if I want to go to film.....otherwise, I say skip the anamorphic adaptor if your final source is video, because the anamorphic adaptor is a lot of glass to deal with and could f*#ck up the focus. I saw the anamorphic adaptor index, great idea.....BUT, lets face it, still a pain. Wondering if anybody else had similar thoughts.
THANKS!