An Ode to NEF

I've read too many web reviews of Nikon DSLRs that, when discussing formats, say something like "Don't mess with the Raw format, JPEG is all you need".

I shoot almost nothing but NEF... having complete control of the image as it hit the sensor is too good to pass up.

This is from a recent shoot: celebrity lighting-designers in lighting showrooms. I had to do a bunch of these in one day, so speed was essential. For this one, I wanted to hold all the practical light glows, so I had a color balance nightmare... it was really bright in there, with every possible color temp going on. I bounced a strobe from a nearby corner (with a full CTO gel) and used a 1/30 shutter at about f6. I color balanced for the LCD -- so it would look good for the client on that bright Nikon LCD. Since NEF doesn't change based on color balance, I was safe to correct these with Camera raw.

Here's the before:
before1.jpg

And the after, using nothing but camera raw controls... a little curves or levels and this will be a pretty shot:
after1.jpg

Camera raw rocks because it's non-destructive; and you can open files in 16-bit color space, which gives you even more quality for color correction and CMYK conversions. If you haven't played with it, give it a try.
 
WARNING: We will not have another JPG vs. RAW debate, if you want that, search the archives, we've had several.

----------------------------

RAW is great for most uses and I shoot exclusively in RAW for personal projects or studio work. For weddings and event work I shoot only in JPG. It depends on what you are shooting, so the best advice I can offer to anyone debating between whether to shoot RAW or to shoot JPG is to look at your post processing protocol as well as which you are more comfortable with and move forward from there.
 
Back
Top