Ok, I have been in the market for a new prosumer level HDV camera for some time now and have been looking for deals on used (ebay) cameras for a while, but haven’t found what I am looking for in the $1500 price range. (Canon XHA1, Panasonic AG-HVX200, Sony FX1, etc)
I shoot mostly for personal use to be shown either via dvd/blu-ray or HDD media player to HDTV viewers. Most of my stuff is documentary style and I have been mainly looking for a good device to shoot 24p, preferably in 1080.
This past weekend my brother-in-law; a former film-school graduate, pulled out his hacked Panasonic GH1. He showed me some test footage, and I was impressed enough to come home and start reading up on DSLR’s as DV camera replacements.
Here is my dilemma… is a DSLR a suitable replacement for a traditional DV Camcorder, for someone who uses their camera to film mostly outdoor scenery, etc. A lot of what I do is travel footage and sometimes it is on the fly, without the aid of a tri-pod.
I do all my editing in Vegas Pro 9, and seldom have clips longer than 2-3 minutes each, which I know leads itself to the DSLR… to be honest, what I have read regarding the various DSLR’s has me seriously considering jumping on either the GH1 or T2i and investing in lenses and maybe a Zacuto view-finder, however I am afraid of the form factor as it is stock….
While I have been considering getting back into photography separately, the form factor of the DSLR’s do not seem as comfortable for video and as easy to use as a point and shoot camera and would require much more planning of your shots.
Bottom-line for me… I need an HD camera with a 24p or similar capability, that can do as much in the camera as possible (would prefer to not do it in post-production). -- Works in multiply lighting scenarios, bright sun and overcast; Is rugged enough to travel; stable enough to use hand-held; is reliable and not quirky or cuts off unexpectedly; and offers a stable codec which will not be obsolete in a year.
Am I a candidate for DSLR?
I shoot mostly for personal use to be shown either via dvd/blu-ray or HDD media player to HDTV viewers. Most of my stuff is documentary style and I have been mainly looking for a good device to shoot 24p, preferably in 1080.
This past weekend my brother-in-law; a former film-school graduate, pulled out his hacked Panasonic GH1. He showed me some test footage, and I was impressed enough to come home and start reading up on DSLR’s as DV camera replacements.
Here is my dilemma… is a DSLR a suitable replacement for a traditional DV Camcorder, for someone who uses their camera to film mostly outdoor scenery, etc. A lot of what I do is travel footage and sometimes it is on the fly, without the aid of a tri-pod.
I do all my editing in Vegas Pro 9, and seldom have clips longer than 2-3 minutes each, which I know leads itself to the DSLR… to be honest, what I have read regarding the various DSLR’s has me seriously considering jumping on either the GH1 or T2i and investing in lenses and maybe a Zacuto view-finder, however I am afraid of the form factor as it is stock….
While I have been considering getting back into photography separately, the form factor of the DSLR’s do not seem as comfortable for video and as easy to use as a point and shoot camera and would require much more planning of your shots.
Bottom-line for me… I need an HD camera with a 24p or similar capability, that can do as much in the camera as possible (would prefer to not do it in post-production). -- Works in multiply lighting scenarios, bright sun and overcast; Is rugged enough to travel; stable enough to use hand-held; is reliable and not quirky or cuts off unexpectedly; and offers a stable codec which will not be obsolete in a year.
Am I a candidate for DSLR?