AF100 vs. 5D Comparison

[TCSJordan]

I shot this video comparing the AF100 to the 5D Mk II. It was also my first edit with Final Cut X, so it's pretty basic in its editing.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vaTtK0-N-s

I have chosen to use the AF100 as my primary camera over several others I have liked working with. The most recent cameras I have used are the 5D Mk II, JVC HM700, Canon XF300, and JVC HM100. These are all great cameras, so it speaks volumes that I just ordered an AF100 as the TCSTV camera of choice. I would love to see a a codec with less compression with the card based media next time, but for the price, it certainly beats the hell out of the Sony FS100, especially in terms of handling, exposure control, and monitoring. I think we're obsessing over low light performance a bit too much. For any rationally lit scene, this camera rocks. As you can see in this bright daylight video, where the FS100 is at a serious disadvantage, the AF100 looks great with no extra accessories.

I deliberately opted not to use a reflector or sunswatter for this video to test the camera in the worst lighting conditions and it looks great. I'm now solidly in the Panny camp after shooting with JVC and DSLRs for some time.

 

[Babu]

The AF100 is a nice camcorder. I own one. The FS100 is also a very nice camcorder. Sharper, Larger Sensor, Handles highlights a bit better, smaller, and superior in Lowlight. No need to knock it at all. I love my AF100 and the image it puts out. I hope to get another 2yrs out of it before upgrading. We'll see.

On another note great videos on Youtube! Very educational and funny. The SD test was hysterical!

 

[bkatcher]

I have an AF100, a 7D and an Xh-A1, and the Af100 blows the other two away. Compared to the 7D, the Af100 has much better sharpness and clarity, and less image problems. Compared to the Xh-A1, the Af100 is much cleaner, and a much more pleasing image.