http://www.jove.com/video/50377/implantation-of-the-syncardia-total-artificial-heart
I've done quite a number of surgeries in the past few years, this is probably the most radical of the bunch using the AF100. Fast forward to ~4min for the actual surgery. OBVIOUS WARNING: Surgery. Blood n' stuff.
Intro and conclusion lighting was horrible. Surgeon had no time before surgery, and was so thoroughly tuckered afterwards that he gave me 8 minutes to get what I needed before he went somewhere to collapse. I make it a rule to not argue with men who have just hacked out other mens' beating hearts with scissors.
With the severity and variation of surgical lighting, the AF is far easier to use than any DSLRish cam. The whole setup has to be completely free from extraneous connections - shotgun mic and wireless receiver, and that's it. The boxy shape wipes down easily enough. The 14-140 is my go-to lens since low light is never the problem, and lens changes are unlikely. Previous cameras I've used like the HVX200 and HMC150 simply lacked the detail and dynamic range of even the lately poorly-regarded AF.
My usual support gear is a Manfrotto monopod; it requires a small footprint, you have to move frequently, AND you might have to hold the camera above your head for hours as a stretch.
I've tried various full-automatic cameras from GoPros to purpose-built surgical cameras to get a 2nd angle, but they all have the same failings: they can't adjust properly to the intense spot lighting, and the surgeon's head will always be the only thing in their frame during the most vital part of the procedure. Mount the GoPro to the surgeon's head, and he won't look in the right direction and everyone will become seasick. To get these procedures properly absolutely requires a man with a camera hanging out over the surgeon's shoulder. Typically, I'll have a sterile drape mounted along the length of the monopod as a preventative against the surgeon bumping an unsterile bit of video gear.
Anyway, so there's one of my schticks. I know there's at least one of you out there that similarly utilizes the AF, eager to hear any constructive criticisms or tips for next time.
I've done quite a number of surgeries in the past few years, this is probably the most radical of the bunch using the AF100. Fast forward to ~4min for the actual surgery. OBVIOUS WARNING: Surgery. Blood n' stuff.
Intro and conclusion lighting was horrible. Surgeon had no time before surgery, and was so thoroughly tuckered afterwards that he gave me 8 minutes to get what I needed before he went somewhere to collapse. I make it a rule to not argue with men who have just hacked out other mens' beating hearts with scissors.
With the severity and variation of surgical lighting, the AF is far easier to use than any DSLRish cam. The whole setup has to be completely free from extraneous connections - shotgun mic and wireless receiver, and that's it. The boxy shape wipes down easily enough. The 14-140 is my go-to lens since low light is never the problem, and lens changes are unlikely. Previous cameras I've used like the HVX200 and HMC150 simply lacked the detail and dynamic range of even the lately poorly-regarded AF.
My usual support gear is a Manfrotto monopod; it requires a small footprint, you have to move frequently, AND you might have to hold the camera above your head for hours as a stretch.
I've tried various full-automatic cameras from GoPros to purpose-built surgical cameras to get a 2nd angle, but they all have the same failings: they can't adjust properly to the intense spot lighting, and the surgeon's head will always be the only thing in their frame during the most vital part of the procedure. Mount the GoPro to the surgeon's head, and he won't look in the right direction and everyone will become seasick. To get these procedures properly absolutely requires a man with a camera hanging out over the surgeon's shoulder. Typically, I'll have a sterile drape mounted along the length of the monopod as a preventative against the surgeon bumping an unsterile bit of video gear.
Anyway, so there's one of my schticks. I know there's at least one of you out there that similarly utilizes the AF, eager to hear any constructive criticisms or tips for next time.