Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
the top end will be drastically different on those two mics not just proximity.
Is there a reason that you cannot use the same mic used for the original production dialog?
To avoid any room reverb - the omni capsule of the MK012 has no proximity effect (omni) but would be less ideal than the RE20 close mic ability in this regard.
???
So... all the production dialog was recorded with an omnidirectional mic? Are you going to ADR the entire thing, then, or do you have any usable production dialog? This can make a difference in mic selection for ADR.
Some folks tend to mix terms that in reality aren't synonymous. ADR means dialog replacement and it should be able to smoothly intercut with other cuts from the same scene. Let's say we have a sequence of a medium shot of Joe saying "Let's go downtown today," cut to Mary looking puzzled, and then back now to a CU of Joe saying "I want to buy you that ring I promised." The sound got screwed up on the CU so we need to replace that line ... we want it to intercut with the previous line so we don't disturb the illusion of being in a certain location. In that case we probably want to record the replacement line with the same mic as we used for the first line so the two lines will have the same timbre. OTOH. the next shot is the two of them opening the garage door and Joe says in voice-over "...and that's when we learned the car had been stolen!" Now that is a comment outside the actual location seen on the screen, directed to the audience rather than to Mary, and as such not only can it have a different timbre, it probably SHOULD have a different sound to it and using a different mic would be no problem, indeed might even be desirable.
I would say they are different enough that it would be disconcerting to anyone really paying attention. The illusion that we're eavesdropping on an alternate reality as we view the scene is a fragile one and it's very easy for sound discrepancies to shatter it.
I remember reading somewhere on the net a post of yours; though I can't remember what it was, it was informative.
What I would like to do is actually go back to locations and record ADR there with portable video looping - same mic, with the actor in the same physical position etc. But in the case that the actors have to be recorded at their convenience in a reverberant environment, it would be great if I could use an RE20 for max isolation. Is it the case that these two beautiful sounding mics would be too different in character to match (given post eq/lexicon reverb match etc)?
It hasn't been shot yet - its going to be MK012 hypercardioid capsule for the production (indoors). And if and when the ADR can't be done on location, I want to be sure that it will be perfect where it can be done.
It hasn't been shot yet - its going to be MK012 hypercardioid capsule for the production (indoors). And if and when the ADR can't be done on location, I want to be sure that it will be perfect where it can be done.
I would say they are different enough that it would be disconcerting to anyone really paying attention. The illusion that we're eavesdropping on an alternate reality as we view the scene is a fragile one and it's very easy for sound discrepancies to shatter it.
omni capsule?
Follow best practices on your production and see what you come up with, any problems could be entirely different.