I know one of the advantages of using a micro 4/3 camera is that you have a wider lens selection for cheap (*cough* Canon FD *cough*), but I had never heard of the C mount until recently.
This is very interesting stuff- they seem to be so wide and so fast and so #$%^ing inexpensive!
But the question is, are they actually any good?
I saw a few examples from some brand called "computar" (really? Did someone think that name would make them sound futuristic back in the 80's?), and the picture seemed kind of soft.
Then, upon further research, I see a lot of these are mostly 16mm lenses, causing severe vignetting. Sometimes that's cool, but other times folks end up zooming in with the crop tool to get around the soft edges, which then makes the "wide" part less enticing. At that point, is a 20mm F/1.7 lens cropped in really any more valuable than a 50mm F/1.8 FD lens?
Or are there some really good C mount lenses that I'm not aware of? Either way, there is some cool stuff there!
This is very interesting stuff- they seem to be so wide and so fast and so #$%^ing inexpensive!
But the question is, are they actually any good?
I saw a few examples from some brand called "computar" (really? Did someone think that name would make them sound futuristic back in the 80's?), and the picture seemed kind of soft.
Then, upon further research, I see a lot of these are mostly 16mm lenses, causing severe vignetting. Sometimes that's cool, but other times folks end up zooming in with the crop tool to get around the soft edges, which then makes the "wide" part less enticing. At that point, is a 20mm F/1.7 lens cropped in really any more valuable than a 50mm F/1.8 FD lens?
Or are there some really good C mount lenses that I'm not aware of? Either way, there is some cool stuff there!