High1ander
Well-known member
I have read that the difference in resolution between 720p and 1080 on the HVX200 is about 20%.
But how much longer time does it take to render stuff in Premiere and After Effects?
I am gonna do a short that will be directly geared to to a film festival which might show it on the big screen. So I would like to have the possibility to shot 1080p, however if it is like 4 times more time consuming in editing, etc. then I might reconsider.
I will do, CC, add 3D-animations, composites and so which has it pros and cons for larger originals.
My gut says 720p, but my pride says 1080p.
edit: When I do the math on pixeldifference, then 960*1280 and 1280*1080 sums up to, first 691200 and then 1382400. Which means that 1080 is twice as much in terms of pixels. Which I guess should equate to 4 times the render time, however, where is the 20% resolution difference from? Is it resolution charts?
But how much longer time does it take to render stuff in Premiere and After Effects?
I am gonna do a short that will be directly geared to to a film festival which might show it on the big screen. So I would like to have the possibility to shot 1080p, however if it is like 4 times more time consuming in editing, etc. then I might reconsider.
I will do, CC, add 3D-animations, composites and so which has it pros and cons for larger originals.
My gut says 720p, but my pride says 1080p.
edit: When I do the math on pixeldifference, then 960*1280 and 1280*1080 sums up to, first 691200 and then 1382400. Which means that 1080 is twice as much in terms of pixels. Which I guess should equate to 4 times the render time, however, where is the 20% resolution difference from? Is it resolution charts?
Last edited: