I left for a while but I found something that I thought may benefit you guys in one way or another...I dont know.
It is a 4 way format shootout, comparing well lit, and identical, scenes and locations shot with:
1) Super 8 Vision2 200T stock
2) 16mm I forget what stock it was
3) Super 16mm
4) MiniDV footage which the tester told me was done on a DVX100A.
http://www.philrosefilms.com/kodakfilmdemo.html
This is about the fairest test I think I have seen. It doesn't seem to be too biased and the footage from all of them look good IMO. You will be surprised how little difference there is in the Super 8 and the 16mm with recent advancements in film stock. You can draw your own conclusions about the DVX vs. Super 8 or the rest of them.
I know some of you may argue you could have done better lighting, yada, yada, but that isnt the point. These four clips were all shot with the same lighting so the playing field is still level. Maybe these will help some of you in some way.
Have fun and enjoy!
It is a 4 way format shootout, comparing well lit, and identical, scenes and locations shot with:
1) Super 8 Vision2 200T stock
2) 16mm I forget what stock it was
3) Super 16mm
4) MiniDV footage which the tester told me was done on a DVX100A.
http://www.philrosefilms.com/kodakfilmdemo.html
This is about the fairest test I think I have seen. It doesn't seem to be too biased and the footage from all of them look good IMO. You will be surprised how little difference there is in the Super 8 and the 16mm with recent advancements in film stock. You can draw your own conclusions about the DVX vs. Super 8 or the rest of them.
I know some of you may argue you could have done better lighting, yada, yada, but that isnt the point. These four clips were all shot with the same lighting so the playing field is still level. Maybe these will help some of you in some way.
Have fun and enjoy!