What do u think about this analysis?...specially vis a vis ur experience of DVX100E (or AE)
http://www.hifi-writer.com/he/progscan/progscan.htm
http://www.hifi-writer.com/he/progscan/progscan.htm
25P ...NO GOOD?
- Thread starter Aejaz
- Start date
JanBee
Active member
Re: 25P users...any comments?
Re: 25P users...any comments?
That report gives some info about how intense interlace flickering is. The conslusion of the report might lead to the impression that interlaced and full (progressive) frames look pretty much the same.
Well, I'm not sure if the author really wanted to stress that. I don't think so, because there definitely IS a significant difference, most noticable when filming moving objects or moving the camera (I do not want do recount in detail).
The difference is ONE part (of few) that make a video look more like film. There is absolutely no doubt and it doesn't matter if you're thinking about PAL or NTSC.
Re: 25P users...any comments?
That report gives some info about how intense interlace flickering is. The conslusion of the report might lead to the impression that interlaced and full (progressive) frames look pretty much the same.
Well, I'm not sure if the author really wanted to stress that. I don't think so, because there definitely IS a significant difference, most noticable when filming moving objects or moving the camera (I do not want do recount in detail).
The difference is ONE part (of few) that make a video look more like film. There is absolutely no doubt and it doesn't matter if you're thinking about PAL or NTSC.
Re: 25P ...NO GOOD?
ok.. i'm not the number one in the cold technical stuff.. but from what i understand by reading this article is not that "25P is not good", but that it's not such a revolutionary development in PAL land, while it is, very much, in NTSC.
besides that, i wish people would just use their eyes and decide from what the monitor say. my monitor say "25P good... 25P awesome!!!"
ok.. i'm not the number one in the cold technical stuff.. but from what i understand by reading this article is not that "25P is not good", but that it's not such a revolutionary development in PAL land, while it is, very much, in NTSC.
besides that, i wish people would just use their eyes and decide from what the monitor say. my monitor say "25P good... 25P awesome!!!"
Barry_Green
Moderator
Re: 25P ...NO GOOD?
What Shai said. Just look at it. Interlaced PAL video looks like video. 25P looks like film.
What Shai said. Just look at it. Interlaced PAL video looks like video. 25P looks like film.