Smettli, those are shot with the anamorphic lens? or are they letterboxed. Either way, by letter boxing the footage you are not showing the full resolution of a captured anamorphic frame.
Come one - can it really be true that no-one has a raw frame taken with the anamorphic lens lying around... Please - if possible - post an unsqueezed frame and the frame after unsqueeze. Pretty please - with suger on top of it?
Thanks for posting the pictures, Smettli. I'm not quite sure I'm understanding the anamorphic concept right with this lens... In order to make a true 16:9 widescreen in PAL resolution you'd have to make it 1024 x 576 pixels, right? Then how come yours are 720 x 431? Is this the work of DVfilm Maker? If you wanted yours in the 16:9 aspect ration they should be 720 x 405 pixels...
when you shoot with the anamorphic lense you have to stretch out the image in post? Any one from NTSC land that can help? I have PP, what would the process be for me?
whoa whoa whoa, calm down turbo. does this mean that while doing both of these letterboxing and anamorphic lense, you get a wider shot? as in, close to cinescope?
No, you only get as wide as your lens allows. By using an anamorphic lens and letterboxing you get an aspect ratio of cinescope. The width is the same as any other anamorphic footage.