joe 1008
Veteran
NBCshooter said:The HDX400 is an interlace camera ONLY. It does NOT and will NEVER do "24p."
Well, the european version does 25p - quite close to 24p. I´ve seen features shot with 25p - it works quite well.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
NBCshooter said:The HDX400 is an interlace camera ONLY. It does NOT and will NEVER do "24p."
No, because the HDX has that expensive tape drive in it. They could engineer the HPC to cost less even though it has more features, potentially.NBCshooter said:come to think of it. If the 1080i-only HDX400 is pricing out at $32K without glass, that suggests that the HPC2000 has got to price out at some kind of premium above that, yes?
Ahhh, yes. The tape drive! Well, then I stand behind my original prediction on the HPC2000 price . . . $29,500 MSRP without glass.Barry_Green said:No, because the HDX has that expensive tape drive in it. They could engineer the HPC to cost less even though it has more features, potentially.
joe 1008 said:Well, the european version does 25p - quite close to 24p. I´ve seen features shot with 25p - it works quite well.
Jarred Land said:D5 is 235mbit.. 10 bit solid.
Yes, and they've already shown a picture of a 2/3" P2-based camera with an "HD D5" badge on the side of it.contentlab said:so my idea of putting D5 right to P2 is workable? without raiding cards?
pmark23 said:Why no 1080P?