I tend to favor minimalism and limitations, and I generally steer clear of the hype surrounding new product releases. With its smaller sensor and fixed lens, the Canon XC10 actually seems superior to its "big brother," the C100 Mark II. It performs well in 4K, though it’s even better in 1080p. I wouldn't be surprised if it outperformed cameras with larger sensors; often, it is precisely within the realm of limitations that the real advantage lies...
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
The compact Canon XC10 has caught my eye
- Thread starter Takumarr
- Start date
morgan_moore
Major Contributor
On paper I think it is attractive.
Its an old camera now. - slow af, bad UI, sketchy EVF setup that blocks touch screen.
My canon small camera journey ended up with me discovering how extremely good an R6i and 24-105 (F7.1) is.
Today an R8 and 24-105 is probably amazing too.
Every way I looked at it a camera with a removable lens and a $100 50mm would win for getting beauty shots when the time pressure is off
You just have to have that look in your pocket.
---
XLR.. Ive got a diety PR4. It is as small as many XLR top handles. for mirroless. Or you can leave it at home, or plugged into the sound desk.
Its an old camera now. - slow af, bad UI, sketchy EVF setup that blocks touch screen.
My canon small camera journey ended up with me discovering how extremely good an R6i and 24-105 (F7.1) is.
Today an R8 and 24-105 is probably amazing too.
Every way I looked at it a camera with a removable lens and a $100 50mm would win for getting beauty shots when the time pressure is off
You just have to have that look in your pocket.
---
XLR.. Ive got a diety PR4. It is as small as many XLR top handles. for mirroless. Or you can leave it at home, or plugged into the sound desk.
Last edited:
morgan_moore
Major Contributor
Its a 2015 camera - they are just clunky.
Today (check the model) canon have a top dial C1/2/3 which enable you to hop from 25p to 50p or other things that you set up.
That is a very strong interface.
Please consider R8 and 24-105 and 50 1.8 unless you are getting this for £500
Today (check the model) canon have a top dial C1/2/3 which enable you to hop from 25p to 50p or other things that you set up.
That is a very strong interface.
Please consider R8 and 24-105 and 50 1.8 unless you are getting this for £500
The fact that the camera is from 2015 doesn't make it bad; in fact, for me, it’s a plus.
Slow autofocus is forgivable—though fast autofocus is certainly an advantage.
As for the user interface—if you’re referring to the grip and button layout, or if the menus are disorganized—well, perhaps that’s reason enough for me to switch from a C10 to a Panasonic G9...
If a 2000 Opel Corsa gets you to work just fine, there’s no reason to go for some massive 2026 Audi!...
Slow autofocus is forgivable—though fast autofocus is certainly an advantage.
As for the user interface—if you’re referring to the grip and button layout, or if the menus are disorganized—well, perhaps that’s reason enough for me to switch from a C10 to a Panasonic G9...
If a 2000 Opel Corsa gets you to work just fine, there’s no reason to go for some massive 2026 Audi!...
rob norton
Veteran
What are you shooting?
rob norton
Veteran
I think enjoyment is the main reason to pick one up. I’m not sure how much of a leg up you’re getting with it’s limitations. It’s cool there’s an EVF attachment.
I’ve got the DJI pocket 4 and it’s extremely fun to shoot with.
XC10 looks perfect for experimental films, it definitely has exhibition loop vibes.
I’ve got the DJI pocket 4 and it’s extremely fun to shoot with.
XC10 looks perfect for experimental films, it definitely has exhibition loop vibes.
One would expect the C10–C15 series to perform significantly better than a DSLR. Furthermore, since this is a "C" series camera—designed specifically for video—there is reason for optimism. ofcorse it might be deceptive. it is important to distinguish these models from the D or M series. In terms of battery life, it should also outperform a standard stills camera. For me, the 1-inch sensor is the ideal format—compact yet capable of professional-grade performance; experience has shown that larger sensors tend to generate excessive heat. That said, it may still have its own flaws or shortcomings...
This camera used to have a very high price tag—not worth the cost. However, you can sometimes find one for less than $400...
This camera used to have a very high price tag—not worth the cost. However, you can sometimes find one for less than $400...
rob norton
Veteran
What's professional grade? You could argue that it's most unprofessional to show up with a canon C10. But it's not about that, I'd just use it then judge the experience and results.
Hi Rob, I’m not saying the C10 is a professional-grade camera. I said that 1-inch sensors are professional-grade for video. You really don’t need a larger sensor; perhaps larger sensors are more for still photography...
Nowadays, even professional camcorders use 1-inch sensors... If they are well-built, they are sufficient for professional video, right?
Nowadays, even professional camcorders use 1-inch sensors... If they are well-built, they are sufficient for professional video, right?
Last edited:
rob norton
Veteran
That's fair. I think you'll definitely have fun with it and it'll give you a great image!
morgan_moore
Major Contributor
Hi Rob, I’m not saying the C10 is a professional-grade camera. I said that 1-inch sensors are professional-grade for video. You really don’t need a larger sensor; perhaps larger sensors are more for still photography...
Nowadays, even professional camcorders use 1-inch sensors... If they are well-built, they are sufficient for professional video, right?
I recently crewed on a shoot for a 'big pop band' - highly professional. We shot 480p interlaced on a Panasonic. They wanted an 'mtv' look and had to pay extra for it.
--
1in vid cams are OK,
XC10 probably OK
For me R7 or R8 and 24-240 (and a 50) will eat of of them for image fidelity. (with loss of ND and XLR)
You gotta make you own trade off..
price
roll time
XLR audio/nd
image fidelity
evf quality
AF speed