Haven't seen it yet, but I'm wondering if soooo many years away from actually hands on making movies have left Lucas and Spielberg behind...
For example, Lucas makes the first three Star Wars stories 20 years later going so strongly into the latest technologies (greenscreen + CGI everywhere) that the actors couldn't get into character and the whole set of three movies just stunk. Lucas and Spielberg make the 4th Indy film and from all the posts and reviews it simply misses the mark. I think in both cases they probably should have found the best writers and filmmakers in Hollywood today, gave them a budget and turn them loose (with appropriate guidance of course).
On the flip side, Peter Jackson used every classic trick in the book to make TLOTR trilogy and only resorted to CGI as a last resort. The result was probably the best films ever made. Following it up with King Kong was a tactical mistake as that story has already gotten enough coverage.
What would Indy 4 look like if M. Knight wrote it and Peter Jackson directed it?
Bob
For example, Lucas makes the first three Star Wars stories 20 years later going so strongly into the latest technologies (greenscreen + CGI everywhere) that the actors couldn't get into character and the whole set of three movies just stunk. Lucas and Spielberg make the 4th Indy film and from all the posts and reviews it simply misses the mark. I think in both cases they probably should have found the best writers and filmmakers in Hollywood today, gave them a budget and turn them loose (with appropriate guidance of course).
On the flip side, Peter Jackson used every classic trick in the book to make TLOTR trilogy and only resorted to CGI as a last resort. The result was probably the best films ever made. Following it up with King Kong was a tactical mistake as that story has already gotten enough coverage.
What would Indy 4 look like if M. Knight wrote it and Peter Jackson directed it?
Bob