Hi,
I am about to shoot a documentary using the Canon XH A1 as the A camera and the Canon HV20 as the B camera.
From what I have read the look of both these cameras matches up very well, so I am not worried about the look of the video. My concern is dealing with the variations in the codec which might have an effect on working in 24p.
My tentative workflow would be to shoot both cameras in 24p mode, but since the HV20 has to be trans-coded to true 24p editable material (which means lots of wasted hours in post) I would import and edit the material as 29.97 and not remove the flags from the Canon A1 footage.
This should keep the look of 24p but in a 29.97 timeline, thereby creating a simpler post process, and ending up with a 1080i HD master for Blu-Ray with the look of 24p.. How does this sound so far??
Now my question is if I go with this workflow, if we are lucky enough to get theatrical distribution, is it possible to remove the interlace and end up with a 24p version to print to film?
Thanks for your help.
I am about to shoot a documentary using the Canon XH A1 as the A camera and the Canon HV20 as the B camera.
From what I have read the look of both these cameras matches up very well, so I am not worried about the look of the video. My concern is dealing with the variations in the codec which might have an effect on working in 24p.
My tentative workflow would be to shoot both cameras in 24p mode, but since the HV20 has to be trans-coded to true 24p editable material (which means lots of wasted hours in post) I would import and edit the material as 29.97 and not remove the flags from the Canon A1 footage.
This should keep the look of 24p but in a 29.97 timeline, thereby creating a simpler post process, and ending up with a 1080i HD master for Blu-Ray with the look of 24p.. How does this sound so far??
Now my question is if I go with this workflow, if we are lucky enough to get theatrical distribution, is it possible to remove the interlace and end up with a 24p version to print to film?
Thanks for your help.