Beyond P2

Bucknfl

Well-known member
I’m wondering what could be the next format to replace P2. I’m thinking of something in terms of more capacity and cheaper to the point of not having to be reused in the field.

Express Cards
Iomega Rev disks
Blue Ray or HDVD disks
New p2 cards that are larger and cheaper

Any ideas out there?
 
P2 just started....... whya re you worrying about whats gonna repalce it.? Actually, probably nothing. its just a Data storage system. it can scale and grow to new codecs and sizes. the P2 system will probably be around for a while. Plus new more efficinet codecs like the 100mbps AVC intra, will provide D5 like quality at half the bitrate. so p2 technology is still VERY viable and still technchally overpowered for the job. it has a 640mbps trandsfer rate. thats 6X faster than the highest bit rate asked of it today.
 
"...and cheaper to the point of not having to be reused in the field."

what the heck value would this be? do you somehow miss the stacks and stacks of tape that used to pile up on your shelves?

really the ony thing realistically set to compete with p2 is the express card.
 
I think what the OP meant by "not having to be reused in the field" is that you would have enough p2 cards for the entire days shoot and no need for a p2 store, laptop or external drive to dump to in the field. I imagine the OP would still reuse the cards for the next shoot. At least I hope so...
 
If they're inexpensive, large capacity, and truly last 100 years they sound great for backup and maybe even an end format to compete with blu-ray etc. Would all depend on data rates and players and marketing though.
 
I don't have any tapes on my shelves. My work flow as a dp is I shoot and hand over tapes, film, or p2 to the producer.
 
Bucknfl said:
Express Cards
Same thing as P2, only a different form factor.

Iomega Rev disks
Not likely. Thomson's trying to use it for Infinity but they haven't even been able to release it yet.

Blue Ray or HDVD disks
As "beyond" P2? Not gonna happen, in fact it'll go the other way; Sony's the only manufacturer making blu-ray camcorders and they're already moving towards solid state.

New p2 cards that are larger and cheaper
Guaranteed.

If you want to see where things are headed, look to the progression in other recording media. There are basically three professional recording forms out there: audio, still photography, and video.

In audio? Used to be tape, then optical disc and hard disk, and now that's all pretty much obsolete as solid state is all the rage.

In still photography? Used to be film, they experimented with optical disc (Sony's Mavica) but that flopped, they briefly tried hard disk (especially the Micro Drives) but nobody uses those anymore. It's all solid state now.

In video? We started on tape, people are currently experimenting with optical disc and hard disk, but it's all going to go solid state. Every major manufacturer is offering solid state recording.

Now, you can argue whether that solid-state recording will be P2, or expresscard, or AVC-HD to SD memory cards, but as to whether it's solid state memory vs. anything else, I have no doubt solid state is inevitable.
 
Thanks Barry. It looks like REV could be a good archive solution for p2 users.

Here's another article on REV.

FFV To Develop Embedded REV PRO-Based Solution For SX Camcorders
Tue, 24th, Apr 2007
Email this article
Printer friendly page


Fast Forward Video will collaborate with Grass Valley, to develop a cost-saving retrofit kit for Sony Betacam SX camcorders.

The kit is designed to replace the existing tape elements of the standard-definition camcorder with the digital tapeless recording capabilities of the Grass Valley REV PRO digital media drive. Additionally, the REV PRO-SX drive can record in HD or SD, transforming these tape-based SD camcorders into current day HD file-based camcorders with the added benefit of removable digital media.


The kit is designed to replace the existing tape elements of the standard-definition camcorder with the digital tapeless recording capabilities of the Grass Valley REV PRO digital media drive.
For tape-based users making the conversion to a file-based infrastructure, REV PRO-SX provides a cost-effective solution and extends the operational life of their camcorders. With the REV PRO-SX retrofit kit, current tape-based SX users will gain all benefits of tapeless digital media acquisition, such as excellent picture and sound recording, file-based storage, tight non-linear editing integration, media cloning, and digital archiving, all provided by the low-cost, removable, and durable REV PRO media.

The retrofit kit's built-in REV PRO drive replaces the existing Sony proprietary MPEG-based tape elements of the camcorder while converting the signal to digital directly from the CCD image sensor to deliver extraordinary image quality. The REV PRO-SX essentially converts the tape-based camcorder into an almost all-digital, file-based camcorder, supporting tapeless news and production workflows. The device will also scale images to HD, allowing users to continue using their SD camcorders with the added benefit of built-in HD upscaling and recording.

The REV PRO-SX, with HD, will list for $8,995 plus installation and will begin shipping to authorized service centers in Q3.

"We are very pleased to work with Grass Valley in bringing this innovative and cost-effective tapeless, file-based solution to our customers," said Scott Keating, vice president of sales and marketing for FFV. "The retrofit will allow customers with older SX tape-based camcorders to upgrade to what is basically full digital operation with HD capabilities, all without the cost of replacing their current camcorders."

This collaborative development effort between FFV and Grass Valley is part of the Grass Valley Open Alliance Partner (OAP) Program and the Grass Valley REV PRO Certification Program. The REV PRO Certification Program includes companies like FFV, which have announced support for the IT-centric removable media and more open and flexible approaches to newsgathering and field production using the Grass Valley Infinity Series of products. The retrofit kit is the first of several planned DVRs by FFV supporting Grass Valley REV PRO media.


Weblinks: http://www.ffv.com http://www.thomsongrassvalley.com

Read more stories about or involving: FFV Thomson Grass Valley

See also:
Fast Forward Video Appoints Hal J. Reisiger As New President & CEO - Tue, 5th, Jun 2007
FFV Announces New Multi-Use Xi Deck To Replace Tape-Based Recording Devices - Thu, 10th, May 2007
FFV Announces New Recon DVR With Optional USB, CF, & SDI Features - Tue, 1st, May 2007
FFV To Develop Embedded REV PRO-Based Solution For SX Camcorders - Tue, 24th, Apr 2007
FFV Announces Next-Generation Omega HD DVR With JPEG2000 - Tue, 3rd, Apr 2007
FFV At NAB2007 - Tue, 6th, Feb 2007

Content Creation
Latest Headlines

Idaho Public TV Selects Broadcast Pix Slate 1000 Digital Switcher
Channel One Russia Standardizes On Panasonic P2 Solutions
Blackmagic Intensity Pro Now Shipping
Carolina Panthers Score First Vision Production Switcher
NEWS Corporation/NBC Universal Joint Venture Inks Deals With Premier Content Partners
Noise Industries Partners Roll Out FxPacks For Apple Final Cut Studio 2
Pansonic's Varicam & LCD Monitor Provide HD Acquisition & Monitoring For Barry Russo
Ross Video Appoints Andrew Tan Regional Sales Manager - Asia
Tampa Bay Devil Rays Add Sony's XDCAM To It's Line-Up
Autodesk Releases New Version Of Maya Personal Learning Edition Software
Snell & Wilcox At BroadcastAsia 2007
Snell & Wilcox At BroadcastLIVE
Noise Industries Ships FxFactory For Apple Final Cut Studio 2
Gigawave HD D-Cam Wireless Camera Systems Used At Eurovision Song Contest
Boris FX Product Line Supports Apple Final Cut Studio 2
 
Same thing as P2, only a different form factor.
Same thing in regard to them both being solid state, but very different in some important respects - especially price! And not only cost/GB, but not needing the complicated (and hence a fixed premium/card, irrespective of size) controlling electronics. That's significant because Express Card can theoretically be marketed like CF or SD in a wide range of sizes, with price roughly proportional to size.
Now, you can argue whether that solid-state recording will be P2, or expresscard, or AVC-HD to SD memory cards, but as to whether it's solid state memory vs. anything else, I have no doubt solid state is inevitable.
Yes, agreed to a point, but a strength of the Sony and Grass Valley strategies is that their media can be solid state OR 'consumable' - choose as appropiate. My understanding is that Sony don't see SxS replacing XDCAM disc so much as living side by side with it for the foreseeable future, quite possibly with a hybrid disc/solid state camera.

Whilst the argument is XDCAM disc v P2 it is very horses for courses. A future hybrid XDCAM disc/SxS camera would be a clear winner IMO.
 
Same thing in regard to them both being solid state, but very different in some important respects - especially price! And not only cost/GB, but not needing the complicated (and hence a fixed premium/card, irrespective of size) controlling electronics.
Are you aware of some announcement of SxS pricing? I certainly haven't heard of any such thing. But based on what they've said, and that they're targeting an 800mbps data transfer rate, I wouldn't be surprised at all to find out that SxS has similar RAID controlling hardware inside it, and will likely be priced comparably.

That's significant because Express Card can theoretically be marketed like CF or SD in a wide range of sizes, with price roughly proportional to size.
Yes, but ExpressCard does not = SxS any more than PCMCIA = P2. Yes there will be cheap ExpressCard SSDs, but I haven't heard anything from Sony to imply that they'll work with those. There are also cheap PCMCIA cards, but the P2 system doesn't work with those!

I'd be grateful for any links to any official announcements from Sony to the contrary.
 
Are you aware of some announcement of SxS pricing?
AFAIK no formal announcement has been made, but I've been told that it is expected to be significantly less than P2 on a GB basis. But personally, that is less significant than the expectation that SxS will exist in a range of sizes at proportional price points, whilst P2 cards are expected to get bigger with the price per card remaining level.

For some that may not make a difference, but for many of us a 30 minute card is about optimum - hence 8GB at DV25, maybe 16GB for 35/50Mbs XDCAM HD. SxS pricing promises to satisfy that, P2 does not.
Yes, but ExpressCard does not = SxS any more than PCMCIA = P2.
True enough, but it is possible that other ExpressCard memory (without the 800Mbs speed of SxS) will work in this system - though not be able to download with the same maximum speed. That's still to be seen of course, so would you prefer the sentence to read "That's significant because SxS can theoretically be marketed like CF or SD in a wide range of sizes, with price roughly proportional to size."?

People may be interested in this link in this context - http://www.tvnewsday.com/articles/2007/06/07/daily.3/ - an interview with ABCs VP of Engineering Dave Converse. Scroll down and he talks about thoughts for making a decision on an HD ENG format within the year.

But what seems so important to me is that the choice is no longer a solid state format v a disc one, but solid state v disc/solid state family.

Yes, there is a lot of information still to come, but it makes me think all the more that currently the best thing to do regarding any purchase is wait and see if you can, using existing assets in the meantime.
 
but I've been told that it is expected to be significantly less than P2 on a GB basis
Told by who though? See, here's the problem I have with this concept: Sony has never, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever offered media that's less expensive than ANYONE else. Ever. Why should we expect them to break with tradition this time?

Maybe they will, but it would be a major departure from past trends. Sony has always made proprietary solutions and charged more for them. But from the buzz I keep hearing on this and other forums, for some reason people expect that XDCAM EX is going to use nonproprietary, cheaper, off-the-shelf recording media. So I'm asking a serious question here: has there been any official comment to warrant such optimism?

I think a lot of people may have heard "expresscard", then they looked up Lexar's line of SSDs, and thought 1+1=2. Maybe it will. We'll find out in about six months. But I think history's against it, and I think the whole notion of them announcing their own SxS cards, instead of saying "we'll work with off-the-shelf ExpressCard SSDs" points conclusively towards a proprietary solution.

But we'll see.

As for cost per gigabyte, I can't fathom of Sony being the low-cost leader. It's never happened before. Now, it's true that they'll have longer runtime per gigabyte, so people may be able to say "an hour of P2 costs more than an hour of SxS" but that's again an apples-to-kumquats comparison (4:2:2 vs 4:2:0, intraframe vs GOP, etc). But a lower cost per gigabyte? I doubt it, it would be historically unprecedented IINM.

It would be a very welcome turn of events for that company, but I reserve the right to be highly skeptical until the actual product announcements hit.

(and, of course, that presupposes that P2 prices stay where they are; P2 could fall to half its cost per gigabyte by the time SxS comes out).

As for disc, that might become an option with AVC-HD, never would be an option for DVCPRO-HD, but... hasn't optical disc pretty much proven to be a flop in every other recording format it's been tried? It flopped in still cameras, and minidisc flopped in audio recording, and the jury's still very much out on how it'll do for video recording; DVD camcorders are doing okay I guess, but as solid state becomes bigger/faster/cheaper I expect it'll leapfrog disc for video just like it did for audio and stills.

Isn't it somewhat interesting that while every other major manufacturer has introduced or announced that they're going to offer solid-state recording, no other manufacturer has announced an optical disc recording system? And the reason the BBC gave as to why it rejected even looking at XDCAM-HD for Starwinder was specifically because it used an optical disc? I dunno, I don't think disc holds that much promise, but the concept of a permanent storage media certainly does have appeal.
 
But personally, that is less significant than the expectation that SxS will exist in a range of sizes at proportional price points, whilst P2 cards are expected to get bigger with the price per card remaining level.

Excuse me? Would you show me in print where you got this information. Where and how has the price stayed level? If that was the case the 8GB card, and the 4GB card would continue to cost $2000, and the 16GB card would be at $900. We have always said that the prices would follow Moores' Law.


For some that may not make a difference, but for many of us a 30 minute card is about optimum - hence 8GB at DV25, maybe 16GB for 35/50Mbs XDCAM HD. SxS pricing promises to satisfy that, P2 does not.

Then the 32 GB card I have in my hand would do the trick at 100MB as that would get me 30 minutes per card in HD. Granted these babies won't deliver till November but I have seen a couple at this point and they will very likely deliver on time. Point here is that evev with the 16GB cards, I can do an hour over two at full frame rate or over an hour twenty at 24pN. And I would have Intraframe recording not a long GOP recording. Keep in mind the differences of the algorithm here as it is significant.


True enough, but it is possible that other ExpressCard memory (without the 800Mbs speed of SxS) will work in this system - though not be able to download with the same maximum speed. That's still to be seen of course, so would you prefer the sentence to read "That's significant because SxS can theoretically be marketed like CF or SD in a wide range of sizes, with price roughly proportional to size."?

These speeds are theoretical, just like the P2 card is theortical. The fastest we have been able to get the resto fo the system to perform at was 550Mbps. So it will continue to be theory for another couple of years on either card.

But what seems so important to me is that the choice is no longer a solid state format v a disc one, but solid state v disc/solid state family.

I do not see where the disc part of your decision is attractive, you can go there is you wish, I just don't see why anyone would want to, its expensive.

Yes, there is a lot of information still to come, but it makes me think all the more that currently the best thing to do regarding any purchase is wait and see if you can, using existing assets in the meantime.

Only if you think Interframe recording the bee's knees. I don't happen to think that Long GOP is the best place in production, distribution maybe, but production, it feels like a compromise, and I should get something really wonderful for the compromise.

Best,

Jan
 
Told by who though?
It's "perceived wisdom" from pretty well everybody I've spoken to on the subject, (including one rep from Panasonic) but it's also worth looking at http://www.tapelessrev.com/xdcamnab2007.html if you want something in writing. Not an official Sony site, but they do seem to be well across what Sony are doing and were possibly the first to break the Sony NAB news. They say: "The EX will record to the new PCMCIA Express Card format, the successor to the PCMCIA Cardbus style interface that Panasonics P2 uses. This will allow faster file transfer than P2 at a much lower cost of ownership."
But we'll see.
Absolutely, I couldn't agree more. But it's why I say waiting seems good policy at the moment if you can, and not going for EITHER P2 OR XDCAM disc at the moment.
(and, of course, that presupposes that P2 prices stay where they are; P2 could fall to half its cost per gigabyte by the time SxS comes out).
Maybe, and maybe SxS could also have fallen further by then! (And the "coming out" is getting close anyway.) But many people are less interested in the per gigabyte cost than the minimum cost per individual card - 8 or 16GB cards getting ever cheaper, rather than being replaced by 32 or 64GB etc in future at the same price.
And the reason the BBC gave as to why it rejected even looking at XDCAM-HD for Starwinder was specifically because it used an optical disc? I dunno, I don't think disc holds that much promise, but the concept of a permanent storage media certainly does have appeal.
True enough, and I wouldn't like to have been one to have to make a choice between XDCAM disc or P2 solid state - they have complementary advantages and disadvantages. But XDCAM as a family now means BOTH, and a hybrid camera would be the real icing on the cake from a freelance point of view IMO. No longer a choice between the two formats or media when you're buying gear, just use the most appropiate media on a shoot by shoot or client by client basis.

It'll be interesting to see what the BBC do now. Although they publicly stated a preference for solid state as you say some while back, AFAIK they haven't yet made a big commitment to any tapeless format, or any single manufacturer. Maybe Sonys SxS announcement will mean that they may be considered by the BBC again?

But as you say - we'll see. Personally, as a cameraman, the best news would be for Panasonic to announce a future committment to SxS in place of P2. It would be the start of a move back to the universality of the Betacam days that freelance cameramen so badly miss.
 
Personally, as a cameraman, the best news would be for Panasonic to announce a future committment to SxS in place of P2. It would be the start of a move back to the universality of the Betacam days that freelance cameramen so badly miss.

Well you may have in your quaters of the world found a universality in Betacam, but Panasonic sure didn't. ;-)
 
We have always said that the prices would follow Moores' Law.
I think what has been said is that the cost/GB would follow Moores Law. I don't dispute that. But the point at issue is whether a 16GB card (say) will remain available for a number of years with it's cost halving year on year.

I've been told that is not the model for P2 development, but if you care to say differently I shall be very happy - it is what's needed.
Then the 32 GB card I have in my hand would do the trick at 100MB as that would get me 30 minutes per card in HD.
Errr.. well yes, but presumably at much higher cost than an 8GB one.........

But that aside, can you guarantee me that that 32GB card, that "30minute card", will remain available for a number of years to come - cost halving year on year, Moores Law?
These speeds are theoretical, just like the P2 card is theortical.
I didn't think the actual 640Mbs P2 speed was at all theoretical - it's an advertised spec. True, few people can even begin to take advantage of it at the moment (100-200Mbs is nearer the mark for most users), which is exactly why a cheaper than SxS ExpressCard memory may be highly attractive in the future - if it works. This is what a lot of people are very eager to discover........
I do not see where the disc part of your decision is attractive, you can go there is you wish, I just don't see why anyone would want to, its expensive.
Expensive..... compared to P2........!? Regarding why anyone should wish to go there, then two answers are instant archivability and the ability to hand rushes immediately to a client after shooting. No laptops, no P2 store, no downloading time. But OK, in other circumstances solid state may be a better way to go. I'm certainly not saying "disc is best", period, - rather I'd like to be able to make the "horses for courses" choice shoot by shoot.
Only if you think Interframe recording the bee's knees. ........ but production, it feels like a compromise, .........
Well, all of television technology is a compromise, has been since the days of John Logie Baird, and both the NTSC and PAL colour systems were certainly "compromises". So likewise is DVCProHD with it's restricted horizontal resolution (960 for 720p, cf 1280 for square pixels), and high bitrates relative to HD XDCAM. ALL Tv production systems are inevitably compromises between cost/quality/practicality, and DVCProHD is no exception. I'm not holding the HD XDCAM codecs out as "bee's knees", - the compromises are just in different places.
 
Well you may have in your quaters of the world found a universality in Betacam, but Panasonic sure didn't. ;-)
Which may be why over the last 10-15 years I haven't seen that many Panasonic cameras.............. Just what were the comparative sales of M2 versus Betacam, Jan?
 
M2 ......... wasn't the BetaSP nemesis it was Panasonic's DVCPRO.
It may depend where you live, but here BetaSP tended to be succeeded more by DigiBeta (high end) and DVCAM (news, corporate etc) with a certain amount of SX and some DVCPro.

But the point is that 10 and more years ago a Beta owning cameraman didn't have to worry too much about formats - it WAS BetaSP. The arrival of all the digital formats above meant an equipment nightmare - either buy several cameras, or cut yourself off from certain client sectors.

I've no allegiance to any manufacturer, but do want a return to the days when a client didn't have to ask what format you were working on. Ideally without it being tied to ANY individual manufacturer. (As BetaSP obviously was.) That Sandisk are central to SxS makes me hope that other camera manufacturers will also adopt it, rather than going for other proprietory solutions. (It would still enable manufacturers to use their own favoured codecs.)

The consumer branches within the electronics industry seem to manage much better at setting common standards (whilst being far from perfect), why can't the professional and broadcast divisions show a little more of the same collective common sense?

Rant over.
 
Back
Top