I fully agree. I'd only add that I hope they do something about the form factor - either such a camera is substantially lighter than the HVX200, or it's shoulder mount.Barry_Green said:Nope, I'm asking for AVC-HD (not AVC-Intra) and recording to standard cheap SD cards, not P2 cards. That's the camera that I think would be killer.
Is that not a bit low? I'd heard AVC could deliver the same quality at about half the bitrate (all other parameters equal), so wouldn't it be more likely to be around 12Mbs - maybe higher with the early codec implementations?AVC-HD at 8 megabits can deliver image quality about comparable to HDV at 25 megabits, ........
Quality wise I think that would equate to about 40-45Mbs of MPEG2, which should be a rung above DVCPro-HD on the quality ladder - assuming the source can deliver. Where it will be a rung below is in ease of editing etc - an inter frame system will always require more grunt than an intra frame one.And if you crank it up to maximum bitrate (24 megabits) it should look substantially better than HDV, and you'll still get 16 minutes on that card. It's tapeless and would have a similar workflow to the HVX/P2, but AVC-HD isn't DVCPRO-HD so it'd still be a rung lower on the ladder.
I suspect there may not be that much to choose between DVCPro-HD (100Mbs), AVC-Intra (50Mbs) and AVC-HD (24Mbs) in terms of picture quality. The trade off is more likely to be save data rate but require much more processing power. With AVC-HD more difficult to edit natively than the other two.