Brandon Rice
Distributed Producer
Aram Bauman said:I think you guys are going to have a nice HVX in a week.
um yeah.... if you want to get rid of your DVX, just let me know, haha, lol
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Aram Bauman said:I think you guys are going to have a nice HVX in a week.
desperatecomfort said:Er....what?
Brandon Rice said:um yeah.... if you want to get rid of your DVX, just let me know, haha, lol![]()
snodart said:Guys. BRAVO!!!!! I have only watched a few, but I don't see how this won't end up in my top 3.
Sound and Score could not have been any better. Shots were all great. On the Mark editing. I'll be watching it again... and will be coming back with some questions.
So impressed.
Aram Bauman said:You guys did an excellent job on this. One of my top picks fo' sho'
msconce said:Everything about this blew me away. From Start to finish absolutely brilliant! The acting at the end was amazing!
jpbankesmercer said:Loved: The concept, Bloody Mary, The girls, Bloody Mary’s Hair, That stairs shot WOW, crying statue, low angle shot’s, speeded up beating, “I WILL kill you”-Class, The Bath shots ACE!
Hated: I didn’t hate them but I didn’t like the soft focus dreamlike shot’s, the “No, ooo, ooo, arr” at the end wanted a man scream.
Overall: One of my fav’s. Bloody Mary would kick Candyman’s arse!
+Thanks for your kind word's about mine.
Jp
Lingothree said:Very scary dead lady, and the killing scene (man killing mom, girl screaming in foreground) was chilling.
Costuming - this is the first time I think I've commented on (or even noticed!) this. Costumes were great. Especially liked seeing mom and girl both in white.
Good work!
Jack Daniel Stanley said:great work guys.
nice seeing you step out of the manhole episodic comedy thing and make a MOVIE
really great work
looked great
great acting
only dings are
but it takes a paragraph to explain all that and that's just my opinion, and the paragraph shouldn't overshadow the great professional work here which only takes a few sentences to sum up.
- white walls -- personal pet peeve I know, but dress them out with pictures or something if you can, you know my rant: white walls the hallmark of the indie film with no art direction, this is a very small ding.
- Other ding would be that I was a bit confused at times as to the direction of the story. An Exterior with a sign that said CHapman Academy for girls would have gone a long way - could be under the bloody mary lines at the top. Some how knowing she was coming home from school would have been nice too. As it stood I wasn't sure who the characters were or where we were in th first scene, so when she comes home, to more white walls, wasn't sure about the story progression. Would have had time for the ext. girls college or prep school shot, might not have had time but would have been nice to show her get off a bus or something - her suitcases didn't really read in that shot and they are an important plot point. Seems odd to me that she would discover or conjure BM at school, which is presumably some distance from home and then carry that haunting or possession to another locale ... which was a another bit of confusion. So as you have it, it would be good to clarify "at boarding school" and "at home" and maybe toss us a cookie as to how this haunting or possession or whatever would stay with her or motivate her to go home. As a revision, I would have tried to tie the discovery of BM to her home in some way i.e., she wouldn't do it at school, but reads something in a chat room or overhears something on the phone that the other girls say calling her a wuss or something that motivates her to try the ritual at home where the actual or imagined violence to mom happened. Not that that's a great suggestion, just an idea of what I mean about tying the discovery to the place of violence, betrayal, where she carries this out, etc., as again that beat of leaving the conjure place to go to another place to carry this out seems disjointed to me.
sean90291 said:Superb work. Great performances. Loved the lighting and cinematography and effects. Oh, and the music was damn good too. I was let down by the incoherent story, however. You had everything else in spades. Some of the best filmmaking of the fest as far as I can see. But the story was so random and fractured to me, even for an "art film," that I just didn't get into it. I was captivated by the look and tone, though. Dude's got talent.
penfever said:Now this one was interesting -
if there's going to be a longer version of this film made, then PLEASE put me on the mailing list. I want to see more of this story.
The father looked like Lawrence Fishburne. Just had to say that. But how exactly is he her father? I know, I know, unnecessary question, but it troubled me.
Putting the title after the opening scene - not a technique that I favor in a five minute film. I just don't think it quite...works. It feels like it bisects the film into these two sections, that don't have any relationship to each other. Part A = girls at a sleepover. Part B = Girl blames father for death of mother, goes mad. The only connection is the Bloody Mary routine. Also, a minor quibble, but that girl doesn't really look like she was forced into the bathroom. She waits a nice long time till they close the door then she runs up and bangs on it. Just something that didn't click for me.
Lead actress has balls of steel. In fact, the acting throughout was a highlight, and it makes me very happy to be able to say that. I haven't seen much directing that focused on acting yet in this fest, so it was nice to see that.
But that's leading me away from the raw excitement of this film, which is in the cutting. The use of cutting here is very bold indeed, and it heightens performance immensely. The only 'moment' that's a trifle indulgent is the last shot. She's good, but not that good.
When the 'asshole' widens, by all means, let me know. I'll watch it.
-Ben
rich_s said:I've watched about 80% of the shorts and Bloody Mary is the best one I've seen so far. You've got a distinct style here that you were able to retain through out. You did a great job of incorporating a lot of "horror" elements while not giving in to the Micheal Bay editing style. You respected your story and actors and let the story speak for itself.
One of the moments that stick out in my mind is when the mother is holding the girl and blood starts dripping on her face. Rather than throwing in a flash frame and some over the top effects you let that moment play out which really drew me in and gave me a WTF feeling.
REALLY dug the father. That guy creeped me the eff out. Loved the moment when he turns to the camera while sitting at the desk. Again, I really loved that you let these little moments play out.
Great job man! This is a solid piece of work!
TimurCivan said:Thanks Kholi! I love the "lemme brush her nappy hair part.. lol. if you saw poor rachel, she needed a bit of kindness on set. she was miserable. that costume while looking awesome was apparently
terribly uncomfortable.
Lemme ask you though? you said we could chop it down to five minutes. Do you mean by removing the opening scene or just with quicker cutting???? Acually this should be
directed to mark as he is the Editor. but im just curious what youre thinking? Thanks for watching hope we made you crap you pants.
Getting to the rest in a few minutes!
Jack Daniel Stanley said:yes, which reminds me of the groucho line
"then we took some pictures of the native girls ... but they were underdeveloped so we're going back in two weeks"
part of the Animal Cracker's speech at the piano
desperatecomfort said:thanks luster for the detailed comments! Making my way to yours too!
Yeah, the story definitely has issues. About 50% of the people get it and 50% don't. So after the fest, I may go back to the cutting room to see what I can do to bring in the other 50% with some changes, maybe some slight additions.
Might be cool to have an after-horrorfest director's cut thread...