Lowkus said:The makers of Final Cut Pro are not in the business of hardware...
LOL :grin:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lowkus said:The makers of Final Cut Pro are not in the business of hardware...
donatello said:so what is wrong with making $$ ...
so what if RED makes $5 or $5000 profit on ANY item - if we don't like the price we don't buy it ... i sure notice those other manuafacturers are charging $2000 for a 100gig drive for HVX and other camera's - red is approx 1000 .... ever price Arri plates, rails etc ...
what ever RED sells -you can compare the price to like product out there - if 3rd party accessories are less then you have a choice ..IMO RED is pricing their products at a unheard of price ... many other manufacturers charge according to what the market will bare - so based on other 4k/2k/HD camera's RED could easily price it at VariCam level and it would still be a excellent DEAL ...
for a moment pretend RED is not developing a camera .. so what are you going to buy ? ________ is that a good bang for your $$ ..how much is the lens ? camera plate ? batts ?
we all make $$$$ for our services .. we don't work for FREE ... we make a profit !! same with any company ...
Don't think of Apple Corp as the maker of FCP. The maker of FCP (if you ignore FCP's Macromedia origins) is a computing group within Apple. That group's survival, their paychecks, are dependent on the survival and sales performance of FCP in the marketplace... if FCP stops making the sales, the group gets shut down.town said:Lowkus said:The makers of Final Cut Pro are not in the business of hardware...
LOL :grin:
Jannard said:You are missing only one piece? Companies need to make money (profit) to 1. Insure that the checks to their employees don't bounce and that there is some security for their employees to stay with the same company and not get cast to the street... and 2. Pay for development, marketing and rent (among other things). How much profit to make... that is the question. Charge too much and get undercut. Charge too little and go out of business. And this all assumes that you are building a product that can sell at all. Then throw in the advantage of volume production. And that assumes that there really will be volume at the prices you charge. Ah... the business aspect. It is not quite as simple as charitable thinking. Somewhere is the balance. Those that figure it our are few. And not many are appreciated when then do.
Jim
Also, I'm not trying to suggest that the Red equipment and accessories are overpriced... I haven't a clue what your actual development costs are. It's just that if a modern manufacturing process is used, and the materials used to build the item are readily available, then the cost to create the item should potentially be very low. Maybe I'm underestimating the precision you are expecting from your lenses, or maybe I'm underestimating the expenses involved in your lens design efforts. I just know that when I hear a $5k price for something made of glass and metal, it makes me think something's off kilter.Lowkus said:I'm figuring that employee paychecks, insurance, cost for future development, etc, all get counted as part of development costs.
Good idea. He answered most of my questions while I typed my previous post.Greg Lowry said:I'm nominating Jim for the Most Patient Mogul Award.
Thought about making my own lenses... seriously, seriously thought about it. Actually, I also thought about making a camcorder similar to the RedOne, prior to ever finding out about the RedOne. I just didn't have the knowledge or time to put the whole thing together, and I wasn't about to ask for investors without fully understanding what I was getting into. I went as far as reading up on glass making and electronics design. Eventually gave up on the idea when I saw Red was coming out. I'm still researching electronics for other projects, but I'm not even going to try to compete with established lens companies at this point. Still lenses are adequate for my current needs, and eventually some of the Red lenses may circulate on the used market.donatello said:Please please please !! if you think RED is over charging ( like your bread example ) then how about YOU making one for less - you make one for 5k i'll buy it ... if one thinks there is $$ to be made ( or you just want to do it for mankind or just to offer a fair price) then take that idea and go out -find investors , or get $$ from family & friends and do something about it and/or just make people aware of it all ...
now popcorn at the movie theaters .. Price-gouging? .. i have friend who owns some theaters and the popcorn is how they stay in business ...
so what do you think a "fair" price for RED should be ?
wealth distribution and health care that's another topic ..
in general: IMO money is easy to come by ... keeping it is the hard part ..
Greg Lowry said:I'm nominating Jim for the Most Patient Mogul Award.
Jannard said:Additionally, how do you know we are too expensive on our accessories? We have only announced the price of one.
Jim
Jannard said:Business and charity are two different topics. If you want equity for all, Cuba is a great place. No matter what you make the government takes it all and spreads it around. But then who is motivated to risk any money when you can't make any? Actually, who would have any money to risk?
Jim
Sorry man no.. there is only one aspect of that that is counted as development.. and guess which one it is? I'll give you a hint.. it has the word development in it.Lowkus said:I'm figuring that employee paychecks, insurance, cost for future development, etc, all get counted as part of development costs.
Greg Lowry said:I'm nominating Jim for the Most Patient Mogul Award.