Yes or no?

Yes or no?

  • Yes

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Maybe

    Votes: 2 15.4%
  • Kinda

    Votes: 1 7.7%
  • Sticky

    Votes: 10 76.9%

  • Total voters
    13
Well the question asks "the" forest, implying there's only one. So I'm afraid I'll have to take the secret answer (Ctrl + P) and say "potato".
 
The answer is obviously "maybe" but if you wish to read my extended theory, continue:

the question implies that you are a tree in the forest. Whether or not you are wearing socks is simply a formality, and thus the color cannot be determined with the information provuided. Further, there is no direct indication that socks are even being worn for a fact, therefor the only true answer is "maybe" in ragards to the actual pressence of socks, not their color. The "color" factor is simply produced only to throw us off.

Boo ya!
 
Trees do not have "socks" as I understand, they do have roots though.

[Returns]
Error- Incorrect sentence, question invalidates known definitions.
[/Returns]
 
Shame on everyone who has voted sticky! My logic is foolproof, and Anhar correctly agreed with me above (I think) You are all feeding the fire, but one day it will overtake you, and Anhar and I will be standing off in the distance...

Nick: Oh, look at the cool flames!
Anhar: Umm...you know, we have this fire hose, should we help them?
Anhar starts to walk down hill.
Nick: No! Don't! They brought this on themselves! They should have voted "Maybe"
 
Well see the sap from a tree leaf leaves no emotional backtrack, thus disproving the Fauna theory. But to discuss whether or not the color of the trees sock is there or not is a whole other debate for the Oak Tree Act. To further delve into the issue, hegemony develops the discourse of the trees roots where thus socks would be planted, proving, once and for all, the answer to be 36.5

Therefore I selected 'sticky'
 
I'm more of a sandals type of tree...

The Southern variety, the type that doesn't wear socks with sandals... specially brown socks!
 
Back
Top