My first 'high-budget' (relative I know) commercial has just gone live. Of course I am super excited about the milestone, having learnt everything I know about film on this forum.
That said, I am happy about the product but not satisfied. I'm sure this is normal. We all want to keep pushing it. I know there were a few blunders on set with some shots that we could have avoided especially to do with exposure and locations.
My main concern is with the grade. We didn't have enough money to pay a professional colorist. So we just went with a LUT on Davinci and the rest was pretty much trial and error.
Which brings me to my question; would a better grade have produced considerably better results? Or did the rain start beating us right from the set?
FYI, I was both Creative Director (wrote the whole campaign) and Director/DP on this project.
That said, I am happy about the product but not satisfied. I'm sure this is normal. We all want to keep pushing it. I know there were a few blunders on set with some shots that we could have avoided especially to do with exposure and locations.
My main concern is with the grade. We didn't have enough money to pay a professional colorist. So we just went with a LUT on Davinci and the rest was pretty much trial and error.
Which brings me to my question; would a better grade have produced considerably better results? Or did the rain start beating us right from the set?
FYI, I was both Creative Director (wrote the whole campaign) and Director/DP on this project.