I'm still learning with my Canon Rebel XTi. The first image was taken with the stock 18-55mm lens. The second was taken with the Canon 15-30mm L USM lens. I'm debating investing in that lens, as I take a lot of interior photos.
Obviously there's a reason the lens costs more... it's better. But is it $1,500 better? Both these images show jagged edges, but in RAW format, the stock lens succumbs to these jagged edges, the Canon 15-30mm does not.
While I'm sort of on the subject, how do I compensate for the jagged edges when saving to something other than RAW format?
Both images used AWB. The first image had a 10 second exposure, the second was aim and shoot. The first one was on a tripod, the second one was not.
Obviously there's a reason the lens costs more... it's better. But is it $1,500 better? Both these images show jagged edges, but in RAW format, the stock lens succumbs to these jagged edges, the Canon 15-30mm does not.
While I'm sort of on the subject, how do I compensate for the jagged edges when saving to something other than RAW format?
Both images used AWB. The first image had a 10 second exposure, the second was aim and shoot. The first one was on a tripod, the second one was not.
