What the XL1s Guys Say

David Jimerson

David Jimerson

Administrator
Staff member
Just browsed some Canon forums (or fora, as is actually correct), and they have the same "XL1 or DVX100?" posts we see here.

Their defense of the XL1 comes down, mostly, to "it looks cooler."
 
Re: What the XL1s Guys Say

One guy was saying that non-interlaced material never looks right on NTSC -- so he'd never want to shoot progressive.

No, it was not at all convincing . . .
 
Re: What the XL1s Guys Say

The XL1 is good if you need to make a Big Statement, while the DVX needs no statement at all.
 
Re: What the XL1s Guys Say

The XL1 is heavier and makes a good paper weight.
The DVX fools many people and the XL1 is purchased by many fools.
 
Re: What the XL1s Guys Say

I remember to this day when I came in here and asked Jarred if I should get an XL1s or a DVX100 and he told me to go fock myself. [glow=red,2,300]*[/glow]

I got the DVX100.


[glow=red,2,300]Once again, I have used poetic license in my description of what went down.[/glow]
 
Re: What the XL1s Guys Say

[quote author=Jubal28 link=board=Offtopic;num=1072649317;start=0#5 date=12/28/03 at 17:30:31]One guy was saying that non-interlaced material never looks right on NTSC -- so he'd never want to shoot progressive.

[/quote]

Please tell me your kidding.
 
Re: What the XL1s Guys Say

;) .........*SIGH*...........Beauty is only skin deep.....

Yes many would agree that the XLS looks good, and i agree but the DVX also looks good in its own way! JUst put some matte box and hand grips, focus pullers and the DVX looks really stunnin although..

****HEALTH WARNING******
CHEIF OF MEDICAL
THE USE OF DVX100(A) IS HAZADOUS TO YOUR WALLET
PROLONGED USE MAY CAUSE LONG TERM MONEY DEPT

:D
 
Re: What the XL1s Guys Say

oh boy I love refering to this photo:

setup.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top