C c.g._eads Veteran Sep 8, 2006 #1 cause I'm only upgrading if it makes firefox significantly less of a memory hog.
FlintMI Well-known member Sep 8, 2006 #2 2.0 beta kinda sucked for me, few of my extensions worked, but that's only a matter of time. they now got the close [x] on all the tabs, but again, that's a plug in you can get. few cool features though. once the plug-in guys catch up, it's worth the upgrade it is a memory hog, but that's the tabs man. it's like having 4-5 single window IE's open, right? (memory leak issues aside)
2.0 beta kinda sucked for me, few of my extensions worked, but that's only a matter of time. they now got the close [x] on all the tabs, but again, that's a plug in you can get. few cool features though. once the plug-in guys catch up, it's worth the upgrade it is a memory hog, but that's the tabs man. it's like having 4-5 single window IE's open, right? (memory leak issues aside)
mjmcneese Veteran Sep 8, 2006 #3 Mac users have had tabbed browsing for years now with Safari. The upcoming IE will have it...finally.
Mac users have had tabbed browsing for years now with Safari. The upcoming IE will have it...finally.