Wanted!

c.g._eads

Veteran
Major spoilers below!

Folks. Do not be misled by this movie's marketing. Do not be misled by the trailer or advertisements. They would have you believe this movie is about a secret assassin organization that goes after a new recruit. This has nothing to do with that! Do you know what this movie does have to do with?? Curving bullets!!! Yes, this movie should officially be called The Curvey Bullet Movie. Because 3/4 of the film is taken up either teaching someone to curve a bullet, actually curving a bullet, remembering what it was like to curve a bullet, flashbacks of curving bullets. They didn't name the organization of the assassins. But I wouldn't be surprised if it was called The Curving Bullets.

Okay okay. There are other things that happened in this movie. You wanna know one of them? Okay, I'll tell you. One of the sequences involved sending 1000 rats, each strapped with its own watch and bomb, into the bad guy's lair. Not only that, but this was a very important moment in the movie. It was the ending. This was the hero's genius idea for taking out his enemies. I'm not kidding you.

Sigh... I was looking forward to this movie more than any other movie this summer. Although this director is a little eccentric, I enjoy his inventiveness. I like how he does things you've never seen before onscreen. But when those things involve a to-be-assassinated big shot in a limo watching as our hero helplessly lodges bullets in his bullet proof glass (and doesn't seem to care that someone's trying to assassinate him. In fact, he goes on with his daily life) and our hero then coordinates a stunt in which he has his co-assassinator, Angelina Jolie, speeds past him in a corvette, spins around, races at him, slams on the breaks as to send the weight of the car forward and create a make-shift ramp that allows our hero to then jump his car, spin around 180 style over the limo so that he can now shoot out his window down into the big shot's limo open moon roof... I mean come on. You can do that stuff in Charlie's Angels 3. And I'm not going to argue that it didn't look cool. But the movie was trying to say something. It was posing as a film we should be taking seriously. That's okay though. Just curve another bullet!

This director is very talented but he simply doesn't seem to understand tone. Or at least tone in America. Maybe in Russia this kind of tone is perfect.

Having said all that, I was entertained in a reserved way. Because you're dealing with this visually gifted director, you never knew what was going to come next. The train sequence was pretty cool. I just have no idea how we got there. One second we're in Chicago. The next we're on a train in Russia! I guess bullets weren't the only curves he was throwing at us! Morgan Freeman's voice: "I want you to curve the storyline."
 
ha ha, the curvy bullet. Maybe the stupidest idea since New Coke.

But I mean, the curve bullets were in the trailers. How could you not see it coming?

And seriously? This was your most anticipated film of the summer? How many decent assassin movies NOT directed by Luc Besson have there ever been?
 
I'm posting in here because the other thread seems to be a love fest for the film. Saw the midnight showing last night. HORRIBLE. It is all style, no substance, and the whole thing played like a promotional video for the next Video CoPilot DVD.

The dialogue was horrible, the story was worse, it was a blatant Fight Club/Matrix ripoff and it failed on both fronts. The Fight Club portion was dumb and the Matrix stuff was just laughable.

On the positive side, I got the phone number of the hottie next to me. If you can go see this filma nd hook up with the 22 yr old dancer (not exotic) sitting next you you, then see the film. If you think that might not happen, skip the film. Dont even watch it on DVD. Just watch Fight Club, The MAtrix, and a few VCP promotional videos and you'll get the main idea.

This wasnt my most anticipated; that would be Batman. I didnt even WANT to see this, but I figured I would so I went lat night at last minute. Hancock is also a highly anticipated film, but the early reviews are horrible. Oh well.


How many decent assassin movies NOT directed by Luc Besson have there ever been?

There have been a number of them. I can only count two by Besson and can count many others.
 
just got back from seeing it, I have to say this is a very very poor film, you are right the trailer is very misleding in a bad way I would at least expect to live up to half the trailer but I dont know its just bad action cinema, poor story, lame scenes
"rats" I was waiting for a long time for this film and I am highly disapointed
they said this guy that made the film is the "spielberg" of russa
get the hell out of here man :(
 
I avoided the trailers so I didn't know about the curvy bullets. I loved the cast and liked the director and thought, "Ooh, this is going to be good." Oh well.

And yeah Brian, I agree with you. It wanted to be The Matrix and Fight Club. Those were two movies I kept thinking of. But there were so many lame ideas. Like the whole "code woven into fabric" thing. It played like a bad joke.

Yes, I am looking forward to Hancock too. Congratulations on the girl btw. Does she have a friend? :)
 
She had a few. LOL. We'll see if this goes anywhere and then maybe I'll toss something in your direction. lol. I think the coolest thing about her, though, is that she had no problem with the fact that I was at a midnight showing by myself. I've come across too many chicks in LA that think that if you do ANYTHING by yourself that there must be something wrong with you. She's cool.
 
The message of this film is one of the worst things I've seen in recent films...

It basically is advocating a self-fish society... which if you look through the past you know that only leads to destruction.
 
They showed a several-minute preview on local (Russian) TV. It was soooo bad. The effects looked like something some kids cobbled together with After Effects after watching a few VideoCopilot tutorials.

Sadly, in Russia it's now known for a fact that this director is "better than Spielberg".
 
The effects looked like something some kids cobbled together with After Effects after watching a few VideoCopilot tutorials.


Exactly. Now imagine a full length film that is just one VCP slo-mo bullet tutorial after another... over and over the entire film.


Sadly, in Russia it's now known for a fact that this director is "better than Spielberg".

I will admit that there were a couple moments that I thought were well done, but this guy has more in common with Stephen Sommers than Steven Speilberg. I haven't been able to catch Nightwatch or Daywatch yet, but if it's more of this garbage, I'll pass.
 
The message of this film is one of the worst things I've seen in recent films...

It basically is advocating a self-fish society... which if you look through the past you know that only leads to destruction.

You don't even need to look at the past.
 
I really liked the film.

it was pure kick ass. If you are de-constructing this on a realism level or even a story level.. you'll never be satisfied...

its an adrenaline filled action film. not much more..

it was fun to watch.

a far better film though.. is wall*e.
 
Loki, I would accept that argument if it wasn't so obvious that they were aspiring to bigger things. The second you have your main character spewing philosophical voice over in the opening scene, you are asking the audience to take the film seriously.

I'm still trying to understand the rats. Oh my God. The rats!
 
My issue with Loki's response is that I can suspend reality for a story. But this has horrible story, horrible characters and horrible dialogue. The only thing it has is effects, and those are VCP grade.

Some friends just texted me to invite me to this and then a bar afterward. I think the bar is a good idea. They're going to need a stiff drink after this. Maybe they should hit the bar before they go.
 
i'm kind of stunned there was enough appeal for you guys to buy tickets. each time I saw the trailer play in theaters, the audience groaned. i, on the otherhand, was laughing... inanity gives me the giggles.
 
To be honest, there was ZERO appeal from the trailers. I thought it looked completely ridiculous. The only reason I went was because at 11pm Thurs night I was bored and thought that if I went to the Midnight in Burbank that no one would be there. I didnt want to deal with crowds for this stinkfest. And the reason I would go, even if I thought it would be bad - because I will either see a film, or not. I dont "wait for DVD". And if I'm going to see it, it will be on the biggest screen possible.

Otherwise, you are correct. There was nothing from the trailer that made me want to see it.

Sorry... that's not true. The trailer made me want to see it to see if it was really that bad. It was. (Same reason I saw The Happening and The Hulk.)
 
Russian accent: "Rats. Peanut butter! Remember that. Rats... and.... peanut butter."

I don't remember for sure but I believe those were the character's parting words right before he died. "Rats. Peanut butter."

I don't know. I'll try to be nice. Maybe these things hold more significance in Russia?
 
I actually liked this movie...Plus, I needed something to cleanse, "The Happening", that cluster@%&# of a movie from my mind.
 
Back
Top