Unnecessary censorship...

Pookie

Pookie

Veteran
IMPORTANT NOTICE: No media files are hosted on these forums. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website. We can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. If the video does not play, wait a minute or try again later.
I AGREE
 
It is totally wrong. Especially with children involved.
Children + sex-- does not = funny.
That producer needs a day-long ass-kicking.


For the sake of decency, this entire thread should be deleted.
 
Last edited:
gco said:
Children + sex-- does not = funny.
Click to expand...

I don't think so either.

The fact that someone would go to the trouble to make this then post it on youtube creeps me out.


My 2 cents.

//Jimmy Kimmel Show? That's pretty low humour for that show. -10 on the ol' respectometer.
 
I think it's funny. They simply bleeped out real words yet did not add anything. It's our minds that fill in the blanks, so if you want to blame someone, blame society for why a bleep is interchanged with sexual innuendos in your mind. :) Plus, if we didn't have censorship at all, the bleeps would represent nothing, and the clips would never be misconstrued. hahaha.

This is another one:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-Wd-Q3F8KM


Btw, can anyone PLEASE explain why I can code websites, but i can never get the youtube videos to play in the forum. Don't I just wrap the address with tags?
 
Last edited:
gco said:
It is totally wrong. Especially with children involved.
Children + sex-- does not = funny.
That producer needs a day-long ass-kicking.


For the sake of decency, this entire thread should be deleted.
Click to expand...

Where is the sex? No one ever mentioned sex. Its all 100% in your head. All the kimmel show did was add bleeps If you think its wrong or perverted maybe you should ask yourself why you automatically start thinking about sex when you hear a beep.
 
Oh, here we go, haha.

What were the laughs derived from then?

//If it wasn't sexual in context?

//The content is implied. Legally it's fine. Morally, I have an issue with it. That said, I don't see any way of changing minds so for the record that's my last word on it.

Starshine Video said:
Where is the sex? No one ever mentioned sex. Its all 100% in your head. All the kimmel show did was add bleeps If you think its wrong or perverted maybe you should ask yourself why you automatically start thinking about sex when you hear a beep.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
I thought it was pretty funny. If the children actually said or did the things that were implied I'd have a problem with it.

My $.02.
 
smiley-rofl.gif

Kimmel + 10 in my book...
 
Starshine Video said:
Where is the sex? No one ever mentioned sex. Its all 100% in your head. All the kimmel show did was add bleeps If you think its wrong or perverted maybe you should ask yourself why you automatically start thinking about sex when you hear a beep.
Click to expand...

While you are at it, tell me it's raining.
The fact that so many adults think it's funny is troubling to me. Having said that and before this degenerates any further, I am out of here.
 
The stuff without the kids is funny. The stuff with kids just implying cursing is funny. The stuff with kids implying sexual acts is just gross. Sorry, it has nothing to do with being PC. The clip at the end implying the little girl was... ahem... making Grover "very happy" was just creepy. Even though we all know that wasn't what was happening, the fact it was trying to be implied with a 5 year old just isn't cool. Sorry, I've known (and dated) too many victims of child sexual abuse to find any humor in it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top