To squeeze or not to squeeze....

PrestonH

Well-known member
Okay, I've probably answered my own question but I'm having a hard time deciding whether to use my anamorphic adaptor or just shoot in squeeze mode on an upcoming short film project. I want to retain the option of doing a quality filmout at some point in time but realistically, that will probably never happen. My concerns stem from the focus/zoom/aperture combinations required for sharpness while using the adaptor. Even with a production monitor, soft shots are a good possibility without spending a lot of time trying to prevent them. Some tight shooting environments may only exacerbate the problem.

The end product will be on DVD (which is forgiving) but also likely find screenings at festivals via digital projection - unless, of course, a print is required.

The producers of November extracted their 16:9 image from a 4:3 frame so it's got me wondering. What would you do given these circumstances?
 
Re: To squeeze or not to squeeze....

i have always disliked squeeze mode. a lot of people love it. i have seen on other dvx100a's, but i have always despised it with a passion. some people think its awesome, so a lot of people here will like it. i think it looks like crap.
just me!
 
Re: To squeeze or not to squeeze....

i agree with Michael.
squeezed looks artificial, somewhat blocky and blurred.
The letterbox looks 10 times better.

And the Panasonic anamorphic lens is a real delight compared to squeeze.

But the anamorphic is very tricky to use focus. You always have to remember each maximum aperture for each zoom values etc...

but once you remember these values (or write a chart), it will bring you back really beautifull results. Amazing in fact.

The anamorphic looks much much better than squeezed even on my old 21" TV.
 
Re: To squeeze or not to squeeze....

but remember, squeeze mode will make a fat chick look better than a couple beers would
 
Re: To squeeze or not to squeeze....

I'd go with shooting 4:3 and cropping for letterbox any day.
 
Re: To squeeze or not to squeeze....

tmrw i'm seeing the du-art reel of DVX footage transfered to 35mm film, apparently from what i've heard, they think letterboxing is better for film outs
 
Re: To squeeze or not to squeeze....

Kyle,

you mean that letterbox is better than squeeze...
...not that letterbox is better than anamorphic for film ?
 
Re: To squeeze or not to squeeze....

One benefit of letterboxing vs. squeeze is that you can recompose your image in post, adjusting it up or down within your widescreen matte.
 
Back
Top