The Protector

Oh. I just realized you edited it this morning. I'm sure my response was to what you originally posted last night.

And who is this Alex character and why is he stealing my quotes? (joking. I get what happened)

Jean Claude said:
I can't compete with Tony Jaa, but I'm sure I can snatch a few moves.

:thumbsup:

Nate said:
If this is how "not" to make an action film I guess it will just have to be a bad example because I will be studying it.

Bad example for an action film, IMO. Not necessarily for a fight film or martial arts film. So much action, be it car chases or fight scenes, and even random places, was sped up to make it look faster and more difficult. That's cheap, cheating, boring, and ridiculous. CG Neo fighting the 80,000 CG Agent Smiths in whatever bad sequal that was - ridiculous. Things done poorly = ridiculous to me.

John Edward said:
But everyone who knows the plot of this film knew this coming in. I haven't seen the film yet and even I knew what to expect. They went to see the fighting.

I had no idea of the story. No idea what to expect. It shouldnt be that hard to through a decent stiry and decent storytelling into the repetitive fighting.

Forrest said:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex DePew
As for the "realtime without cuts", no big deal.

For hardcore fight fans it is.

Ah, you misunderstood. "no big deal" as in "No big deal to ACCOMPLISH." I think it's a HUGE deal to make a good action or fight flic. Hence the preparation for my film.

Someone said:
I would love to see a badass chick pull this off but keep in mind film is a visual medium and cool looking shots help sell a fight. It's hard to get really pretentious of a martial art film without really knowing what sells them. Many of Don the Dragon Wilsons fights look real but bad choreo (moreso bad direction) hurts the fights in his films.

Very visual. Hence, super hot chica kicking arse. But work that camera so you dont have to cut to a close up for a hit that you cant make look real any other way. There's cheesy crap, and there's interesting camera work. (I was going to say corny crap, but that hits a little too close to home after last night's dinner.)

Nate said:
But keep in mind Tony Jaa never said he did any other style than Muy Thai Kickboxing.
Agreed. And that was the first thing I said to my friend when he complained of all the knees and elbows. I assumed he was talking about Protector and said "he's a Muay Thai kickboxer. that's his style." Then he mentioned, no, in Ong Bak, and that's when I thought - "Great, that's his style, but it gets old." And it did. But that's just my opinion. Fantastic if you gys like it, but it's the same reason myslef and the rest of the box office tired of Jackie Chan. More of the same. Sure he's jumping in and out of a ladder this film instead of a shopping cart, and I really enjoyed and respected Jackie's work, but as a film goer, it got boring.

Mr. Incredulous said:
Ridiculous? Because he used the moves that his style dictates?
No. It was just a silly movie. Silly story, silly acting, silly writing, silly directing, and some kick ass fights mixed in with mostly silly repetitive fights. The thing is, you have no problem watching the same thing over and over. I dont like to. It doesnt make either one of us wrong, it's just what we like. Should be return to the "Jessica Biel's ass" debate?

Kung Fu Master said:
I understand this is your opinion but you do know many martial arts fans love acrobatics mixed with martial arts right. Even I get thrown over and do a cartwheel kick or so. Many of my guys went over (off the ground) for the throws and Brian comes in doing mid-air kicks, off the wall flips and kip-ups.
I understand this. I'm only talking for myself here. Why do people think I'm trying to represent the universe?

As for the acrobatics, I have it in my film too. And the acrobatic fighter gets his ass whooped by a level headed fighter. Flipping is not fighting, and I'm interested in fighting. I realize there is a place for everything. Jaa fits in his niche. I just prefer something else. And, if you go back to the beginning, I say I enjoyed it - more so than all the Sonny Chiba movies I forced myself to sit through. And I really enjoyed and respected the performers in Red Trousers. They have their place. I just prefer something else. That isnt too hard to understand, is it? I'm not trying to convert anyone away from this type of action, I'm just giving my opinion on it. I have to assume that's okay.

Great conversation, Nathyn. I look forward to more. (Probably the least sarcastic line in this post.

-GageFX
 
Wow! Great debate on this thread! GageFX, can't wait to see how your film comes out! With the time and efforts spent on it, I'm sure it'll be top notch!

For the Topic at hand... I love martial arts, Tony Jaa is the man, and I saw the Protector a year ago just like PK did and thought it was pretty awesome!

Just my opinion...
 
SuperStalker3000 said:
Gotta love back tracking.

all me said:
Oh dear lord the movie is horrid, though. See it. You'll love it.

You've never seen a movie so bad it's entertaining?

But feel free to obsess. Christian Bale was great in this movie too. Gotta give it to him.

-GageFX
 
Thanks Golden. We're working hard. The whole cast and crew is great, giving it their all.

-GageFX
 
Ouch... Gayfx, Unless the title of your movie is The Protector you should probably quit the thread hijack, and move along.
 
That 4 minute fight scene with no cuts was just impressive. I read on imdb that it took 6 takes and Tony Jaa was exhausted by the end and had to keep taking smelling salts before the new takes because it was so draining. Dedication!
 
I'm not that impressed with Tony Jaa. I have seen Ong Bak, and it just didn't felt as exciting as, for example, Bloodsport, Kickboxer or Lionheart.(Jean Claude Van Damme)

Even tough Tony Jaa can be an excelent fighter (better than Van Damme, no doubt), the truth is, at least for me, the action was not cinematographic enough- not as engaging, story wise and coreography wise, to the likes of Bloodsport. (I exclude Bruce Lee films because they are from another level completely- the Bruce Lee persona is just from another galaxy)

Van Damme's movies had cheesy story, but engaging, nonetherless. Terribly memorable one liners "Ok, Usa!" "Ha! You lose, American @SShole!" "Now I show you some trick or two" ! "Very Good, but brick, not hit back!", and so on... Ong Bak is just very, very average in story, and only Tony carries the movie. Charisma wise, he's close to Van Damme, but the story of his movies just aren't good enough. Jet Li and, of course, Bruce Lee, are from another planet. Jackie Chan appeals to a different market- Disney, maybe?
 
Back
Top