The Last Airbender - M. Night's latest

Status
Not open for further replies.
This whole thing, in my opinion, is much ado about nothing.

I actually am interested in seeing this, and have been from the first trailer I saw. Might see it with the wife this weekend.

Was this shot 3D or processed? Anyone know?

Processed. Every review says the 3D on this looks really bad and very dark. It seems that the 2D version is the one to stick to for this film.
 
Exactly.

She's also a robot, made by the Japanese in the series/films.

Ackphhhht. Let's not even get started on the feminist angle on this...

We'll probably just finally get over this "race" thing, and then the humanoid androids will come out of the woodwork to get us all riled up again...

Well...witness the replicants in Blade Runner. Or the bioroids in Appleseed... thinly veiled allegories for racism, and slavery...
 
I think that character was designed to offend actors, regardless of ethnicity...

Yep. The whole point was that it was a satire. I don't think anyone walked into Tropic Thunder not knowing that RDJ was portraying a black character.

Ackphhhht. Let's not even get started on the feminist angle on this...

What do you mean? I was just pointing out that when you look at the character, it is actually debatable (much more so than Aang in The Last Airbender) that a character like this has to be Japanese in a live action version. Then you've got the factor of the anime being seen in the US where she is voiced by an American VO actress. So in a sense, a lot of the fans over here might view the character more as American than Japanese.
 
Last edited:
Is there an alternate interpretation for the phrase white people portraying minorities?
Sigh.

Look. All I'm saying is an actor of one ethnicity playing a character of another ethnicity when there are tons of actors of said ethnicity that need the work is bad.

You can disagree with this if you want, and that's fine. But this is my opinion.

When it comes to Tropic Thunder, Downey's character is Australian who thinks he's african american. It's a spoof of what we're discussing here.
 
Ackphhhht. Let's not even get started on the feminist angle on this...



Well...witness the replicants in Blade Runner. Or the bioroids in Appleseed... thinly veiled allegories for racism, and slavery...

True, but what I was referring to was more of the idea that some of (maybe a large portion of) humanity will have an outright fear of robots, especially ones that resemble human beings no matter what ethnicity said androids are modeled on.

Then there is the whole fear of AI debate that would factor into things. So its a different controversy, and of course one we haven't faced yet, or won't for some time.
 
I think the Japanese are leading the way. They apparently prefer to build robots to care for their elderly rather than invite in humans to do the work, when those humans are insufficiently Japanese...
 
I think the Japanese are leading the way. They apparently prefer to build robots to care for their elderly rather than invite in humans to do the work, when those humans are insufficiently Japanese...

There goes the job market.

Seriously though, I think robotics might become the bane of humanity in the latter part of the 21st Century. Not in a terminator sense, but in the sense that the wealthy elite will fill such a large portion of the jobs with robots that there will be massive amounts of unemployed hobos (previously know as Joe_6_Packs) wandering around.

Also, with automated military drones, we could be seeing endless proxy wars around the globe.
 
Sure. The ability to drop bombs without endangering pilots is removal of one level of restraint.

As for the class-warfare angle...really, it's not much different from Ned Ludd's fight back in the nineteenth century. Providing labor-type jobs is not an end in and of itself: if the employer/owner can obtain better bottom lines with machinery, that is where they will go. There's little moral basis for insisting that a business cling to inefficient practices simply because those particular practices keep more workers employed.
 
Sure. The ability to drop bombs without endangering pilots is removal of one level of restraint.

As for the class-warfare angle...really, it's not much different from Ned Ludd's fight back in the nineteenth century. Providing labor-type jobs is not an end in and of itself: if the employer/owner can obtain better bottom lines with machinery, that is where they will go. There's little moral basis for insisting that a business cling to inefficient practices simply because those particular practices keep more workers employed.

I see your point, but at the same time, what are we to do? Leave everyone out to starve?

Of course, with advanced enough automated manufacturing processes, we could possibly move towards a post scarcity civilization in the next one to two hundred years. That'd be the more optimistic way of looking at the future. But will clinging to class and capitalistic ideals cause something like that to never reach fruition?

Ah, where's Star Trek's Federation when you need it?
 
...or robophilia.

mmm smooth shiney sexy plastic and steel fan housings...check out the CPU module on that one...
 
I see your point, but at the same time, what are we to do? Leave everyone out to starve?

No. This society grants people a great many rights (for my part I lean toward maximization of rights as far as practicable) which means that they likewise are subject to many responsibilities. One of which is to keep one's self competitive when it comes to business or employment. Of course it's sometimes practically necessary to assist people in continuing their educations and their training, to keep them competitive. So no, I don't suggest leaving anyone out to starve: I'm proposing that people be educated as required so they have useful skills to offer, and don't have to.

Of course, with advanced enough automated manufacturing processes, we could possibly move towards a post scarcity civilization in the next one to two hundred years.

I think we're way, way past post-scarcity (into post-scarcity?) already. If anything there's a distorting effect from too much product jamming most of the pipelines, which brings problems in its train too.

That'd be the more optimistic way of looking at the future. But will clinging to class and capitalistic ideals cause something like that to never reach fruition?

I don't know. From my perspective Marxism was stillborn and any potential it might have had was buried with its creator. I think that capitalism and class are separable. In fact, I think that we have moved some distance in that direction already.

Ah, where's Star Trek's Federation when you need it?

Watching us from holographically-camouflaged observation blinds, waiting for us to get our shi* together sufficient to be worth contacting.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top