The Cinematography of E.T.

Jim Brennan

VHS Member Old Skool
I had not watched E.T. since its theatrical release. I remember that summer well because I spent a lot of it babysitting my younger cousins. One of them loved E.T. so much that we went to go see it a lot. So much so that my aunt finally said, "no more".

Anyway, I was pretty burnt out on it, and being a punky, know-it-all know it all teenager, who would rather be home listening to Judas Priest and Motorhead, I resented having to sit through a "kid's movie". (I also took them to go see Night Shift, and could not understand why my Aunt was disturbed that I would take her small children to see a movie about prostitution...but that's another story)

But I watched E.T. the other night with my wife and kids on the home theater.

Wow, all I can say is, "what the hell did I know?"

Within the first ten minutes I was looking over at my wife saying "Y'know, this isn't shot like a kids movie". The shadows, the fog, the cuts, the motivated source lights, all reminded my of either a noir or a horror film. That impressed me. So many kids movies are shot flat, like romantic comedies, to keep the focus on the characters in a more generic way.

But then, I was more impressed when I started to see that it was shot like a kids movie...but a smart kids movie. The lighting is a bit over-stylized at times. The hazer is running on overdrive a little more often than normal. The camera never sees an adult's face (aside from Dee Wallace) until near the end of the film when Peter Coyote takes off his mask.

This is a brilliant collaboration between Daviau and Spielberg. I am sure that there were people who were saying "enough with the hazer already" when this thing first screened. It borders on the ridiculous. But it isn't ridiculous. It's perfect.

Nowadays it is common to see movies that appeal to both children and adults, mostly through irony, and self aware pop-culture references. But back then, this was breaking new ground. And Spielberg et al did it in much more earnest way, which is much more difficult. The script is well written, and the allegory is very effective. But the way this movie was shot is the real kicker for me. It feels grown up to adults. But it is the perfect balance between the fantastic and the real for kids to enjoy it.

I know that Spielberg sometimes gets a bad rap in the indie world because his films can be so populist, and the revenue they generate could support most third-world countries. But the one thing that guy NEVER forgets, is that he is a storyteller. Whatever it takes to tell a great story in an effective way, he is willing to do.

E.T.=Genius.
 
I too watched it with my daughter in my home theater recently. She loved every second of it. I hadn't lost touch with the film over the years so I never forgot how well shot the film is. What struck me last time I watched it is how good a performance Spielberg got out of Henry Thomas. Pretty remarkable for any actor let alone a child. I don't know why Allen Daviau doesn't shoot more movies. Empire of the Sun and Avalon are two of the most exquisitely shot films I've ever seen.
 
Last edited:
E.T. Is amazing. But my kids are terrified of him. My mom gave my son and old ET doll and effing freaked out. We tried to watch the movie and every time he even thought it he was coming on screen he would start to cry. Maybe in a few years. But now, hell no.
 
What struck me last time I watched it is how good a performance Spielberg got out of Henry Thomas. Pretty remarkable for any actor let alone a child.

He was great. The only "acted" moment I got from him was when he closes the door on his mom in frustration.

Since we are talking about acting, Drew Barrymore was AMAZING. She was so natural mimicking her brothers at the table, or tattling on Michael's driving. And don't get me started on her crying when E.T. was dying. But when her mom asks her where she is going (into Elliot's room to see E.T.), she sounds exactly like a kid trying to act casual, while trying to keep a secret.

Awesome.
 
I've interviewed and worked with Daviau several times, he is not only a superb cinematographer, but a really nice man as well. One of the highlights of my career has been sitting down to lunch with him and hearing about maiking ET, Empire of the Sun, Harry and the Hendersons and many of his other projects.

He also is one of the giants of the ASC who actually deigns to teach mere mortals, students and aspiring DPs. Talk about a tough job, the couple of times that I have lit his interviews. He even complimented me on how I lit him!

Dan
 
E.T. Is amazing. But my kids are terrified of him. My mom gave my son and old ET doll and effing freaked out. We tried to watch the movie and every time he even thought it he was coming on screen he would start to cry. Maybe in a few years. But now, hell no.

I have one of those kids who isn't afraid of anything. Monster House...nothing. The new Christmas Carol...didn't even flinch.
 
Yes, I have lit interviews with quite a few people who were a little intimidating to light. Allen Daviau, Robert Elswit, John Milius, Curtis Hanson, John Carpenter, George Lucas and Martin Scorsese all come to mind. All were pretty kind to my ego when they looked in the monitor.

Dan
 
Just had a chance to watch the "restored" version of the dvd. While being a classic still, I thought the decision to incorporate the CGI E.T. did the movie a huge disservice--I actually cringed each time I was able to distinguish the CGI; they made it too smooth, too slick. Additionally, the incorporation of never-before-seen scenes disrupted the continuity of some parts, especially the cornfield scene where Elliot first meets ET (I believe there's a really awkward cut to a chain-link fence in there).
 
Spielberg has a far better understanding of the power of cinamatography than any director I can think of. Yes Jim, ET does equal genius. Even after all these years.
 
I agree phudsontx

Steve is the man; it is no surprise with any film he has done.

From the time he made JAWS and on he was the master.
 
Back
Top