Talent Release for Masked Performer

I would guess if they're in a role in some kind of organized performance, then they technically CAN be identified -- there are people who know who was behind that mask.

To be safe, always get a release. Whether or not you're safe in this instance without one, only a qualified attorney could give you a definitive answer.
 
Sure, ideally. But you don't need releases for anyone whose face you don't see, unless you can hear them too. That's why in crowd scenes if you can't see someone's face, you're good to go. They aren't identifiable.
 
Emyr R. E. Pugh said:
Can anyone advise on whether or not a release is needed for a perfomer wearing a mask (i.e. if they cannot be identified)?
Click to expand...


If they're not recognizable, you don't need a release. A release always indicates a person is allowing their *likeness* to be used in a film. If a mask is worn, there is no *likeness*. No face, no release.

.
 
If the release were only about winning a lawsuit over use of a likeness you might not need it. But the real purpose of a release is to prevent the performer from even considering filing a lawsuit in the first place. Them signing it improves the chances you won't ever see a complaint. Plus I'm sure a lawyer would be happy to argue that their performance is a likeness.


Everyone performing in front of the camera should sign a contract/release of some sort anyway, which would include terms of what they are being paid and what will happen to the performance. Background people that you can't identify that aren't part of the production may be fine, but anyone performing you need some paper on.
 
Masks are sometimes considered specific to a performer (kinda like how clowns own their specific 'look'). They own it. If they don't, a costume company might. SAG considers masked actors as Principles.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top