Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So my Colts made it to the SuperBowl today and the Saints squeaked in thanks to several gifts from the Vikings and the officials.
Let the smack talk/predictions/commentaries begin....
I don't think a shoot out, which I also don't like, is the same as a coin toss to see who gets possession first. It's not like the coin toss decides who gets to go first in a sudden death field goal competition to decide the outcome of the game. There are 11 guys out there for the kickoff and 11 guys out there playing offense or defense. NFL teams carry 53 players but only 11 play at a time. Saying all of them need to play in OT is like saying you can't end an OT game in hockey until every line has been substituted in.I'm not a big NFL guy but I do watch on occasion. The NHL is more my thing.
Can you guys explain something to me? How is it that a coin toss is allowed to largely decide the outcome of the game?
Half the team sits down and watches as they win/lose? Seems to lose the 'TEAM' aspect in OT when half of them don't even get to play??
Much like shootouts in the NHL, which are not allowed in the playoffs at all.
Terrible way to decide such an important game.
Mike
I disagree. In the NHL OT every player has a chance to at least play. Depending on who the coach puts on of course but that's normal in both sports. In the NFL one Offensive line doesn't even get a chance to step on the field in most cases. Sorry, that just seems wrong to me.I don't think a shoot out, which I also don't like, is the same as a coin toss to see who gets possession first. It's not like the coin toss decides who gets to go first in a sudden death field goal competition to decide the outcome of the game. There are 11 guys out there for the kickoff and 11 guys out there playing offense or defense. NFL teams carry 53 players but only 11 play at a time. Saying all of them need to play in OT is like saying you can't end an OT game in hockey until every line has been substituted in.
-A
the Saints squeaked in thanks to several gifts from the Vikings and the officials.
I disagree. In the NHL OT every player has a chance to at least play. Depending on who the coach puts on of course but that's normal in both sports. In the NFL one Offensive line doesn't even get a chance to step on the field in most cases. Sorry, that just seems wrong to me.
They should each have an equal amount of chances to score. Hell, even in crappy NHL shootouts each team still has the same amount of opportunities.
Last night I watched one offensive line get a 'second' chance due to a coin toss, the other team just sat and watched.
I just don't think that's fair.
Just my thoughts on what I saw.
And studies don't show anything because one can never predict what Favre would have done with his line had they gone first.
Just seems odd to me.
PS- Just let them all play until someone wins! Then we'll see who the true warriors are.
MAH
all I know is that they stole that game from my vikings![]()
Now those rules make perfect sense!There is an advantage to winning the coin toss actually, I think its only about 60% but it may be a bit higher. Regardless I think they overtime format should be changed dramatically. Give a boot to the "golden goal" mentality and go to high-school/college overtime rules.
The college overtime rules are fair, and provide much more tension and excitement.
Here is a simple article explaining college rules if you don't know them.