I am 20 years old and want to go to the filmacademie.
I want to direct, i like the whole proces of making movies, there is not 1 thing were iam really good at, i know a little bit of everything.
I am thinking: would it be better to study cinematography instead of directing? Reasons: there will be more work (likely), you learn a lot about filming and got to work on many projects for wich you gain set-experience (by directing you work a very long time on your film, the DOP 'jumps' to many more projects. This is even said by students on the filmacademie).
I want to direct, and i know the filmindustry is not easy to come in, and i know we are not doing it for the money. But we dó need to make a living: and as a cameraman/D.O.P. you have very more change of working than a director (not as a DOP, but as assist functions by the camera departement). -A person with a eduction in Directing cannot do very much on other people's projects-.
The benefits are: you are making a living, work on different projects -for a shorter amount of time than the director-, gain a lot of set-experience, and work in the filmindustry (as a D.O.P, or maybe just as a assistent).
Then, in your own spare time, you can work on directing skills.
After i worked a couple of years, i can use my set/film experience and try to get work as a director.
It seems like a far better option than study directing, and trying to get work in the industry as a director. As a cinematographer, the changes of work are far better and i can try to become a director myself.
What do you think about this? I dont even know if i agree with the above my self
.
The other thing is: iam not a techniqeal person, iam not very handy and not good in matmatics... So iam worried cinematograpy is a LOT harder than directing!!!! or am i way of?
Jerry
I want to direct, i like the whole proces of making movies, there is not 1 thing were iam really good at, i know a little bit of everything.
I am thinking: would it be better to study cinematography instead of directing? Reasons: there will be more work (likely), you learn a lot about filming and got to work on many projects for wich you gain set-experience (by directing you work a very long time on your film, the DOP 'jumps' to many more projects. This is even said by students on the filmacademie).
I want to direct, and i know the filmindustry is not easy to come in, and i know we are not doing it for the money. But we dó need to make a living: and as a cameraman/D.O.P. you have very more change of working than a director (not as a DOP, but as assist functions by the camera departement). -A person with a eduction in Directing cannot do very much on other people's projects-.
The benefits are: you are making a living, work on different projects -for a shorter amount of time than the director-, gain a lot of set-experience, and work in the filmindustry (as a D.O.P, or maybe just as a assistent).
Then, in your own spare time, you can work on directing skills.
After i worked a couple of years, i can use my set/film experience and try to get work as a director.
It seems like a far better option than study directing, and trying to get work in the industry as a director. As a cinematographer, the changes of work are far better and i can try to become a director myself.
What do you think about this? I dont even know if i agree with the above my self
The other thing is: iam not a techniqeal person, iam not very handy and not good in matmatics... So iam worried cinematograpy is a LOT harder than directing!!!! or am i way of?
Jerry