I just finished reading the thread about the prat falls of first time directors. It had a ton of great information. However, one thing that seemed to be lacking was an emphasis on the writing. Many, if not most, first time directors are also the author of their script. I'm not sure how apt the comparison is, but it's like the singer/songwriter. One is the natural outgrowth of the other.
Now, over time I have found that many individuals within the cinematic community have a great passion for the technical side, yet they have a lack of knowledge and heart for truely great stories. IMHO, this is the great problem with American cinema today. We are, quite frankly, making derivative fecal matter. "Swingers was a movie about friends and relationships, I can do that!" And so we get "Just Friends" or whatever. I watch somewhere around 250 movies a year. I went to a first run theater less then a dozen times last over that same period. Why? Because as technically proficient as the films have been, the stories are the same. (See, "Cheaper by the dozen 2", "Yours, Mine and Ours", "Electra", so on and so forth ad nausium).
One of the reasons that I eschewed film school was because I quickly realized that no one really cared about the story as much as the "cool" techniques that they could use. When you combine the two, great (see Eternal Sunshine as an example) things happen. However, when someone technical decides they want to direct a film, but does not take the same time to develop their story in the same way that they did to develop thier technical skills, beware. While it's great to have a new incarnation of Ed Wood in Ewe "Toilet" Boll (House of the dead is a favorite) it seems that we have a bunch of folks who were weaned on pulp without understanding the fiction. We tell stories for a reason. We want to evoke certain reactions from our audience, but if you don't have a story to support the visuals, there is little point. I find it sad that so few aspiring filmmakers are as thoughtful with their story.
By contrast, one of the reasons why films produced in Asia are doing so well is because they have really stuck to the importance of story. "Oldboy" is rather Shakespearian. Meanwhile, here in America we're just rehashing and remaking (and poorly) films that were great abroad (Oldboy is set to be remade with Justin Lin at the healm).
To reference another Charlie Kaufman film, if you haven't studied story at all the book "Story" by Robert McKee is great. Also read Plato's symposium.
Just my two cents.
Now, over time I have found that many individuals within the cinematic community have a great passion for the technical side, yet they have a lack of knowledge and heart for truely great stories. IMHO, this is the great problem with American cinema today. We are, quite frankly, making derivative fecal matter. "Swingers was a movie about friends and relationships, I can do that!" And so we get "Just Friends" or whatever. I watch somewhere around 250 movies a year. I went to a first run theater less then a dozen times last over that same period. Why? Because as technically proficient as the films have been, the stories are the same. (See, "Cheaper by the dozen 2", "Yours, Mine and Ours", "Electra", so on and so forth ad nausium).
One of the reasons that I eschewed film school was because I quickly realized that no one really cared about the story as much as the "cool" techniques that they could use. When you combine the two, great (see Eternal Sunshine as an example) things happen. However, when someone technical decides they want to direct a film, but does not take the same time to develop their story in the same way that they did to develop thier technical skills, beware. While it's great to have a new incarnation of Ed Wood in Ewe "Toilet" Boll (House of the dead is a favorite) it seems that we have a bunch of folks who were weaned on pulp without understanding the fiction. We tell stories for a reason. We want to evoke certain reactions from our audience, but if you don't have a story to support the visuals, there is little point. I find it sad that so few aspiring filmmakers are as thoughtful with their story.
By contrast, one of the reasons why films produced in Asia are doing so well is because they have really stuck to the importance of story. "Oldboy" is rather Shakespearian. Meanwhile, here in America we're just rehashing and remaking (and poorly) films that were great abroad (Oldboy is set to be remade with Justin Lin at the healm).
To reference another Charlie Kaufman film, if you haven't studied story at all the book "Story" by Robert McKee is great. Also read Plato's symposium.
Just my two cents.
Last edited: