Sketchy Producer Stories

Thought I'd share some recent stories as a warning to others:

See one day cam op gig posted, no mention of camera, very brief information. Respond with rate, get a very delayed response, find out they want FS7, tell them I don't have FS7, would have to rent.

Producer says she'll call me (which means, she's going to try and get my rate lower.) She calls, I try to find out what the work entails, she says it's really more of a half day BUT company requires 12 hours and rate is $500. She says to achieve the full 12 hours I can include travel, file transfer, etc. She says she can't reach the supervising video guy to find out what the work actually entails (3 days after posting the gig). She also says she didn't know I am sans FS7. I pass, and recommend 2 other ops.



Get email contact from foreign producer who sets up simple half day interview and b-roll gig. She shows me previous work which appears to be simple one camera-one position interviews (with ONE subject) and minimal b-roll. They want me to provide edit, which seems so simple, I just include it.

I travel to remote location and work with field producer. He sets up about 4 or 5 interviews, and I shoot any b-roll I can manage with little to no direction. Then I also find out they have a drone guy there, AND they want me to use pre-existing footage the company had shot.

I email the producer who contacted me initially about, you guessed it, more money. I explain that the work involved is greater than what was originally suggested. She responds along with the field producer who both basically tell me I'm wrong and that the work is very simple, and that they have no more money.

I produce about 3 rough edits, each time getting feedback from the two (non native English speaking) producers giving me contradictory notes. On about the 4th revision request, I tell them I will not be performing any more unpaid post-production work and that they should pay me, after which they can pay my hourly editing rate for more revisions. They pay up and apparently used previous edits to cobble together what they wanted.



Get email contact from producer, says she has two simple "four hour shoots" (each a week apart) "a couple interviews along with b-roll of the office." I give her my estimate, she says they only offer [insert embarrassingly low number here], I have nothing going on so I say ok since it seems simple enough. Then she sends me prior work they produced and I see slider and/or stabilizer used, AND 2-camera interview setups.

I tell her I need an assistant at $250 because I won't be able to get through the work in 4 hours. She cries poor and then sends shot list which is long.

I proceed with the work, and about half way through, become pretty incensed that the shot list is so long and that they expect quality in 4 hours. I email her from my car when leaving to tell he she needs to find someone else for the work the following week.



The commonality in my experience seems to be lack of information which coincides nicely with lack of budget. Many producers seem to play dumb in these instances and deliberately withhold information. When you're used to shorter "production speak," and just a reasonable amount of consideration and respect, I think it's easy to expect that an agreement would be based on what's reasonable in an effort to avoid lengthy communications. There were enough red flags in the first incident I posted above for me to just say no right off the bat.
 
chris-

you have been doing your gig for more than a few years.

what you have described is the job of being freelance or Uber-ized!

i'm sure every one of us could add tales to the pile and more than half would include "and i never got paid".

hang in there, buddy.

i'm rooting for ya'

(plus i have a soft spot for buffalo ny. thumbs up.)

be well.

rob
smalltalk.productions
 
They do this because there is always some kind with a DSLR that will work for days for essentially pennies (or food) to "make their name". This being the problem with so much low priced equipment on the market that can do a fair job in the hands of someone that knows how to use it. Tough world for those getting this kind of work.
 
I'm not sure what the Buffalo market is like, but those kinds of "producers" can go jump of a bridge.

$500 WITH gear for 12 hours?! An operator ONLY rate(no gear) is usually at least $600/10.

I received a call from a crewing agency a few weeks ago. Two days out from the shoot they needed covered. A few interviews in two different locations, two man crew, full day. I tell them I am available, just waiting to hear back from one of my audio guys. While I'm waiting I receive a text from them saying the rate was $1700. While I'm reading that they say, "oops, it's $1600". I try to hold back typing "HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA". I managed to keep it professional and respond that that was significantly below my standard two-man crew rate by at least $800 and a few hundred dollars below even my one-man rate. Then there is the standard back-and-forth: Agency, "this shoot doesn't have a budget". Me, "I understand, I am flexible, but that is excessively low". Agency, "What would you do it for?". I tell them what I did the last shoot for for them when they needed a discount. Replies from them stopped.

Moral of the story: Don't be a low-baller. Once you're one of the cheap guys, you will always be one of the cheap guys. Don't contribute to the erosion of the industry. The more guys say NO to the low rates, the better. The better for you and the better for everyone.
 
You think thats low? I just saw two "seeking videographer" ads for my area that come to mind: one looking for someone to shoot rescue effort footage (mightve heard we had a little rain recently) shooter with own gear for $100-200 for 4-8 hours, another was shooting a cheer competition where they provide the gear for 12 hours for...$200.
 
Ignore the bottom feeders and low ballers. Cultivate your network. Never look for work on Craigslist. Diversify (write, teach, edit, market, etc.) so you have other income streams when production is slow. Run&Gun knows of what he speaks, I say the same the thing about OMBs. If they want a pro, pros generally don't work OMB unless it's just to go out and gather b-roll, or specific shots of places or landmarks, beginners and cheap guys do more OMB work, that's why rates are in the toilet. Because people who don't know any better will bust their butts for hardly any money. When you think about it, producers should pay more for a OMB since that person is doing two or three people's jobs themselves, DP, gaffer, sound mixer and sometime producer/interviewer. They should be able to give that OMB at least half of what that 2, 3 or 4 person crew would have charged, in addition to the camera person rate. Even then, producer would still be saving money over what it should cost.

Problem is, with the price of gear, there will ALWAYS be someone who will do it cheaper or free, it's a race to the bottom. So stay out of the race.
 
Moral of the story: Don't be a low-baller. Once you're one of the cheap guys, you will always be one of the cheap guys. Don't contribute to the erosion of the industry. The more guys say NO to the low rates, the better. The better for you and the better for everyone.

I, like many young dimwits, heard this and didn't take it seriously early in my career.

Now I understand completely. Oh god do I ever.
 
They do this because there is always some kind with a DSLR that will work for days for essentially pennies (or food) to "make their name". This being the problem with so much low priced equipment on the market that can do a fair job in the hands of someone that knows how to use it. Tough world for those getting this kind of work.

There IS that, but I think it goes beyond the ubiquitous 20 year-olds with DSLRs. Out of town producers find me on productionhub which makes my experience and abilities pretty clear. I'm not talking so much about craigslist ads or reality TV gigs.

I'm not sure what the Buffalo market is like, but those kinds of "producers" can go jump of a bridge.

$500 WITH gear for 12 hours?! An operator ONLY rate(no gear) is usually at least $600/10.

These were all out of town producers.

I forgot to mention, she said they allowed a "kit fee" of $250. Regardless, the gig sounded like a lot of work and I hate going into something without knowing exactly what I'm saying yes to. Last I knew, scale for a camera operator was $750/10.

You think thats low? I just saw two "seeking videographer" ads for my area that come to mind: one looking for someone to shoot rescue effort footage (mightve heard we had a little rain recently) shooter with own gear for $100-200 for 4-8 hours, another was shooting a cheer competition where they provide the gear for 12 hours for...$200.

I would love to see footage from a $200/day cam op.

There ya go. I think we've all been there, and regretted it later.

Yep. It's a freelancers distaste for turning down work that gets us into these situations.
 
What I always find hilarious is that the people that want a full crew for pennies on the dollar, ALWAYS are calling you when the job is a day or two out. You don't get to SAVE money when you're doing your pre-production at the last minute. Insane.

I hear you Josh about the flood footage. Guy called me wanting me to go out during the storm on Saturday and shoot footage for $100. Sorry man, no risking my life and gear for that.

I don't mind giving discounts (such as free or reduced gear) for a non-profit. But it galls me what STRANGERS ask for. If I have a WORKING relationship with a producer and respect them...I'm always willing to work with their budget (within reason).

I got passed up on doing a kickstarter type video for a guy in my town recently. Gave them a whole concept and a healthy discount. They went with another company, probably saved a few bucks and got a pretty bad video in return. At this time I'm totally cool with passing on jobs if they get the least bit squirrely.
 
Me too. I don't feel like I've "paid my dues" by any means, I just decide I've had enough way quicker than other folks, apparently. P.S. isn't your town my town?
 
Yes, we have all been there alright, and the things called "cloud producing" or is that perhaps called "production hub" in the US.

An email from a "cloud production company" can I do a quick four-hour shoot at a business some three hours drive away, the fee was below my usual rate but what the hell I was not doing anything that day, so I agreed.
I was told that it was a quick shoot and that details would be supplied on site when I arrived.

I arrive on site early and then find out that an edit had also been agreed, I ring this "cloud production" company to clarify only to be told yes they need an edit, a teary eyed young girl explains she made a mistake, and there is little extra money for the edit. I should have said no but she was crying, and I thought, ok to bail her out of the situation I'll do it.

The shoot, meant to be four hours took ten, there was no one on site with any experience, basically, their HR department directed and scripted it, and I tried to diplomatically tell them it was ****. They refused to listen and stated "just do what you told", so I went into robot mode shooting as instructed.
The entire thing was a dog's dinner, I followed their edit instructions, and it was a mess. I then embarked on a rescue mission and improved it considerably by cutting out 80% of it and throwing in lots motion graphics. I never walk off a job, but perhaps I should have.

Anyhow - these cloud production companies websites give the impression of vast, sprawling offices organising video shoots, glossy stock photo images of modern offices, they are not, they employ people to sit at home on their phones running virtual offices. I spent two days effort fixing this disaster and only being paid for four hours work. Later I found out the Cloud production company took 80% of the fee, i.e. there was a more money it just was not going to be paid to me. The crying on the phone I guess was an act.
They advertise high-quality productions at slightly below market rate and then lie and pay peanuts to the actual people doing the actual work, never again, a learning experience.
 
Yesterday I came up with a phrase "selling sausages at a vegetarian convention"

My gear might offer a remote monitor to the director. I have and a/c - a remote focus - half a van of led - clearly stuff some would value - indeed demand!
But some don't want to buy that and that is fine.

Mellow up I reckon - make your offer clear and hard - but understand the best sausages won't sell well at the vegetarian convention :)
 
Yes, we have all been there alright, and the things called "cloud producing" or is that perhaps called "production hub" in the US.

An email from a "cloud production company" can I do a quick four-hour shoot at a business some three hours drive away, the fee was below my usual rate but what the hell I was not doing anything that day, so I agreed.
I was told that it was a quick shoot and that details would be supplied on site when I arrived.

I arrive on site early and then find out that an edit had also been agreed, I ring this "cloud production" company to clarify only to be told yes they need an edit, a teary eyed young girl explains she made a mistake, and there is little extra money for the edit. I should have said no but she was crying, and I thought, ok to bail her out of the situation I'll do it.

The shoot, meant to be four hours took ten, there was no one on site with any experience, basically, their HR department directed and scripted it, and I tried to diplomatically tell them it was s*%t. They refused to listen and stated "just do what you told", so I went into robot mode shooting as instructed.
The entire thing was a dog's dinner, I followed their edit instructions, and it was a mess. I then embarked on a rescue mission and improved it considerably by cutting out 80% of it and throwing in lots motion graphics. I never walk off a job, but perhaps I should have.

Anyhow - these cloud production companies websites give the impression of vast, sprawling offices organising video shoots, glossy stock photo images of modern offices, they are not, they employ people to sit at home on their phones running virtual offices. I spent two days effort fixing this disaster and only being paid for four hours work. Later I found out the Cloud production company took 80% of the fee, i.e. there was a more money it just was not going to be paid to me. The crying on the phone I guess was an act.
They advertise high-quality productions at slightly below market rate and then lie and pay peanuts to the actual people doing the actual work, never again, a learning experience.

That's when you simply say, "I don't edit". Problem solved. You're on-site. At that point, you hold all the cards and have all the power. You can walk and they have nothing. Or even still shoot it and hold the footage until payment. Yes, you wouldn't see any of the little bit of money period if you walked, but at least you're not being completely taken advantage of. Also, at four hours, I would have shut it down or gotten something in writing that you would be paid for the additional hours.

I've shown up on-site before and not all of the information was given to me beforehand and the producer wasn't happy with me(it was a clothing issue. I was dressed professionally, but wasn't told by the person who crewed me that I was supposed to wear long pants). I laid out the options. All of which involved me getting paid and some of which involved me leaving with my camera. Guess what they chose...

I have a money window that I am willing to work within and I don't go below that bottom threshold. And when crewing agencies call, I raise my rates, because they will want a lower rate and/or take a percentage of your rate(and a percentage/fee from the client), that's how they make their money.
 
Back
Top