Sequential multiplexing standardization

Status
Not open for further replies.
Remember when he was on that roller coaster and his face collided with a bird?

EDIT: I deleted the picture because it was kind of gross.
 
Yea, poor bird......I cleaned it up for family viewing.....
roger_brown_as_a_bird_at_coolham_2003_by_paul_durbajlo.jpg
 
I think the word we need here is "Webocracy" formed from the use of "Web" meaning (1)"a portion of the internet owned or run by a person or persons" or (2) "what a tangled weaving" and "ocracy" meaning "a form of government". So, in this Brave New Cyberworld, Jarred is the leader of "a tangled form of weaved government" ... or "a weaved form of tangled government" ... or "he who owns the gold makes the rules"! And I am glad to be one of his happy "surfs"!


Why not??? (from a female aspect, of course!)
pookie said:
 
TC said:
Do women really find Fabio attractive? Pooh? thartley?

Actually, I don't and I know many female friends that don't. But, with the exception of a "censored" picture he has been the only MALE posted amongst a bevy of FEMALES, though to be fair, both male and female photos have been of airheaded blonds.
 
OK, after what Michael did got him in trouble, why haven't both Pookie and TC been reprimanded for attempting, multiple times, to hijack this thread when some people here are truly interested in finding out really what he did - if anyone did this sort of stuff on another topic, they'd be shut down - fast. Mods, if you don't want us talking about this "incident". Delete or lock the thread please.

I just read the thread at Cow that Noah posted and really, if cross posting about an article got him banned, I'm glad I don't go to the Cow. It wasn't like he posted screeds of content over a million sites, it looks like from that thread, that he posted a link to his article - wow, what a bastard he is!

I read his article again while I was over there and really, what did he say in it that's a problem? He does hassle Sony within the first paragraph so it's not biased, but really the focus was the HVX. He talked about a fixed/interchangeable lens and other options for 3rd party mods, but wow, it wasn't particularly harsh on anyone. Nothing I'd consider a troll. I mean he praises the camera.

Well it looks like he's buggered for whatever reason. As a user I haven't seen any proof of him causing any problems whatsoever and unless other evidence to the contrary appears, I think this whole treatment of him stinks and reeks of trigger happy moderation on everyone's part.


Aaron
 
Wait, I'm confused. How is this not cleared up already? Mike basically spammed the hell out of a variety of threads with the exact same message.

That's irritating. End of story.

And for the record, the Pookmiester and I have done nothing wrong here. Except lighten the mood in a situation that has been blown far out of hand. As Barry said, hijacking is an inevitable part of this community! So just chill out!

chillout250.jpg
 
TC said:
HAHA, sorry. I just realized how easy it is to quote someone incorrectly. :beer:

You could do a change on that quote to "Fabio thinks Fabio is so sexy" and it wouldn't necessarily be incorrect!
:evil:
 
Hey wait a minute, the Fabio thread is mine, you can't say he's sexy:angry:
You can't hijack my own hijack away on me, nooooo way.

Where are those damn moderators? This is unfair.

pout pout pout
 
pookie said:
Hey wait a minute, the Fabio thread is mine, you can't say he's sexy:angry:
You can't hijack my own hijack away on me, nooooo way.

Where are those damn moderators? This is unfair.

pout pout pout

Easy, Pookie, easy. See .. I'm giving the Fabio thread back to you .. its all yours .. <aside to the moderators ... are the guys in the white coats going to get here soon?>
 
Mine, mine, mine.....

The power is intoxicating Moonwind, and only slightly frightening.
Maybe now the voices will stop talking to me.




Nope.
 
NoahK said:
Hi folks-

Just wanted to chime in here for a second. I've stayed out of this discussion because I felt this matter should have been handled privately from the beginning. I wish to direct your attention to this message which may help shed some light on what went down for the curious:

http://www.creativecow.net/forum/read_post.php?postid=111504825848863&forumid=193

Best,
Noah

Thanks for the post Noah.

It was a very well written explanation at cow, but i didnt understand the crux of it :) (Which is fine - as I don't usually understand 2 pages of text before i click 'I Agree' nor understand why my $40 flat monthly plan bills me $79 each month:)

At least there was a reason given.

For those who wonder why Pappas has support - think Jon Steward :) talks crazy but sometime makes sense & nails the issue without fear of repurcussion. Ok Ok comparison maybe a little off, but he looked like a guy how knows what he is talking about, sometimes we can learn a lot from cynics - which otherwise would have been drowned in marketing fluff - particularly for newbies like me, who are here to learn, and are easily swayed by popular support or the loudest voice.

Typical Marketing fluff
"You can fly non-stop from SFO to NYC with 2 stopovers. Stopovers benefit our customers who like to shop at airport"

Newbie: WOW!!! non-stop AND 2 stopovers!!!

CYNIC: wait a minute... this actually means it is a nonstop flight *between* stopovers...it is NOT a non-stop

Another newbie but faking experience: you are a troll! full nonstop! BS! - it can never be done... do u realize SFO is in west coast and NYC in east... get a life or get a map (link to an online map)

newbie-me: (with map in hand) yeah...it does looks far...hmmm... It also says we get free RED-EYE!

CYNIC: Here is proof - In 1972, when UAL first flew..... (and so on...)

Now, the mods have responded - it is not my aim to flamethrow - but it was unsettling to ... anyway.. there is nothing new for me to say... its been said and explained 10 times already...

gnite all :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top