Richard Crowley
Veteran
I posted this question several months ago, but I can't find it (or the replies).
What's up with the ratings feature? I am still seeing "you can't rate something until you have a rating of 50".
Of course if nobody can rate anything, nobody will ever get a "rating of 50" so what good is this to anyone?
I think this would be a useful feature, and I appreciate the requirement to be "rated" yourself to authorize rating others.
But if there isn't some way to "bootstrap" the system to get it going, it just seems like a laboratory curiosity.
Can you (at least for start-up) allow rating based on length of registration and/or number of posts (or something)?
What's up with the ratings feature? I am still seeing "you can't rate something until you have a rating of 50".
Of course if nobody can rate anything, nobody will ever get a "rating of 50" so what good is this to anyone?
I think this would be a useful feature, and I appreciate the requirement to be "rated" yourself to authorize rating others.
But if there isn't some way to "bootstrap" the system to get it going, it just seems like a laboratory curiosity.
Can you (at least for start-up) allow rating based on length of registration and/or number of posts (or something)?
Last edited: