Nektonic
Veteran
Well, obviously this was not nearly as awesome as Moonraker, or You Only Live Twice, where Sean Connery plays Bond as Bond going undercover as a Japanese fisherman.
All kidding aside, I agree with a lot of the criticisms already mentioned, but none of the bad points were enough to kill the thrill. I liked this film. Not as great as some of the all-time action classics, but an entertaining and fun action/James Bond experience. I'd put this one about equal to Casino Royale. CR had more character development, but QoS moved along more fluidly. Definitely more action than CR. I didn't have any problems with the Bourne-style action camera-work, but I never did with the Bourne films either. I would rank the newer Bond films, along with some of the classic ones like Goldeneye a bit below the Bourne trilogy and better than the Tom Cruise Mission Impossible trilogy.
Daniel Craig makes an awesome Bond. Kinda reminds me of Timothy Dalton's Bond, dark, dangerous, and possibly able to go overboard if pushed that far. Connery and Brosnan were more about the charm and womanizing but could still get the job done. Mark Forster did a good job with the action, which is not something he is used to doing.
The Hollywood Reporter lists the budget for QoS as an estimated $230 million. Maybe that is including the marketing budget, but wow, that's a lot more than I would have thought it cost to make.
All kidding aside, I agree with a lot of the criticisms already mentioned, but none of the bad points were enough to kill the thrill. I liked this film. Not as great as some of the all-time action classics, but an entertaining and fun action/James Bond experience. I'd put this one about equal to Casino Royale. CR had more character development, but QoS moved along more fluidly. Definitely more action than CR. I didn't have any problems with the Bourne-style action camera-work, but I never did with the Bourne films either. I would rank the newer Bond films, along with some of the classic ones like Goldeneye a bit below the Bourne trilogy and better than the Tom Cruise Mission Impossible trilogy.
Daniel Craig makes an awesome Bond. Kinda reminds me of Timothy Dalton's Bond, dark, dangerous, and possibly able to go overboard if pushed that far. Connery and Brosnan were more about the charm and womanizing but could still get the job done. Mark Forster did a good job with the action, which is not something he is used to doing.
The Hollywood Reporter lists the budget for QoS as an estimated $230 million. Maybe that is including the marketing budget, but wow, that's a lot more than I would have thought it cost to make.