adamr316
Well-known member
I don't know why it never dawned on me before. We mic the groom and/or officiant up during the ceremony. We also stick our own mic on the podium for the speakers (if any). Or maybe get a feed from the church. But why not get a second wireless receiver for the DJ?
I've got a Sennheiser G2 lav/transmitter and butt-plug transmitter. I use the butt plug and a handheld mic for guest testimonials (messages to the bride and groom). So why not use that same mic for the toasts so I get a clean feed? Well...I don't own an extra receiver!
I just want to double-check with anyone who has already done it before. Because I figure you can have a hundred receivers (or a million bajillion) on the same channel as the transmitter, like listening to a car radio, right? And they shouldn't cause an interference problem, right? At the moment I've rigged my lav transmitter to get a direct feed off the DJ's mixer and that's saved me $200-300 or whatever it'd cost me for an extra receiver but I figure I'd get a bit better audio quality if I got a direct wireless signal. Plus I'd have better control over quality.
I've got a Sennheiser G2 lav/transmitter and butt-plug transmitter. I use the butt plug and a handheld mic for guest testimonials (messages to the bride and groom). So why not use that same mic for the toasts so I get a clean feed? Well...I don't own an extra receiver!
I just want to double-check with anyone who has already done it before. Because I figure you can have a hundred receivers (or a million bajillion) on the same channel as the transmitter, like listening to a car radio, right? And they shouldn't cause an interference problem, right? At the moment I've rigged my lav transmitter to get a direct feed off the DJ's mixer and that's saved me $200-300 or whatever it'd cost me for an extra receiver but I figure I'd get a bit better audio quality if I got a direct wireless signal. Plus I'd have better control over quality.