David G. Smith
Steak Knife Member
Ok, I am kind of thinking out loud here, ya know, spit-balling.
I can't help but think that there has to be a better way to deal with windows, on a protracted shoot with a small crew, then actually applying ND and CTO to each window as you encounter it. What I was thinking about was trying to make up some gel frames, with ND and CTO gel attached prior to the shot that we would be able to rapidly set up outside windows to knock down the light and color correct it for tungsten. Something like this, it seems to me, could be rigged on set by one person in a matter of minutes. Then when you are done, just pull the frames and call it a day (And not have to deal with pulling the gel and transfer tape off of each window).
Now, most standard gel rolls are either 48" or 60" in width and 25' in length so in location scouting we would need to take window measurements and then make frames of the proper size to meet most of our needs for the shoot (and then figure out how to deal with bigger windows; with standard practices probably).
My first thought is to just make some DIY PVC frames that could be placed on the window exterior, with the gel stretched tight on the frame. Thinking about this I figured that dealing with any kind of breeze would be problematic (And noisy in some cases). I also thought that over a protracted shoot, frames made up with just gel stretched tight over them would be hard to handle and keep from ending up "Crinkly", making them unusable. I then started to think about Plexiglass type sheets that I could apply the gel to and use. I found this at the Home Depot website:
http://www.homedepot.com/Building-Materials-Acrylic-Sheets/h_d1/N-5yc1vZbrdg/R-202038067/h_d2/ProductDisplay?catalogId=10053&langId=-1&storeId=10051#product_description
48 by 96 inches is a very good size. I just measured the windows in my house and most of the windows could be covered by a 48"X48" frame; except for our front room picture window which could be covered by a 48" X 60" frame. A few of those HD Lexan sheets could be used to make up frames of appropriate sizes to shoot in a lot of places. I know that great care and handling would be needed in the setting up the gels on the Lexan sheets and in their use and storage on a shoot. I just think that this could save a lot of time over a longer shoot, and take a bit of burden off of more experienced members of the crew (Who would normally be relegated to having to do the tedious work of gelling windows which now could be done by the least experienced crew with the frames).
I think that some sheets of the Lexan with just ND gel on it could be also be very useful when shooting daytime car interiors. You could hang the sheets from a mounting system on the roof of the car and shoot out the side windows with the windows rolled down.
My concerns are:
How would you suggest making frames or a mounting system for something like this? The 48" X 96" sheets weigh 23.7 pounds, so a 48" X 48" sheet should weigh just over 11 pounds. That is not that heavy, but it is a consideration.
And.... Am I overlooking any issues with this whole line of thinking?
So, any thoughts or suggestions?
I can't help but think that there has to be a better way to deal with windows, on a protracted shoot with a small crew, then actually applying ND and CTO to each window as you encounter it. What I was thinking about was trying to make up some gel frames, with ND and CTO gel attached prior to the shot that we would be able to rapidly set up outside windows to knock down the light and color correct it for tungsten. Something like this, it seems to me, could be rigged on set by one person in a matter of minutes. Then when you are done, just pull the frames and call it a day (And not have to deal with pulling the gel and transfer tape off of each window).
Now, most standard gel rolls are either 48" or 60" in width and 25' in length so in location scouting we would need to take window measurements and then make frames of the proper size to meet most of our needs for the shoot (and then figure out how to deal with bigger windows; with standard practices probably).
My first thought is to just make some DIY PVC frames that could be placed on the window exterior, with the gel stretched tight on the frame. Thinking about this I figured that dealing with any kind of breeze would be problematic (And noisy in some cases). I also thought that over a protracted shoot, frames made up with just gel stretched tight over them would be hard to handle and keep from ending up "Crinkly", making them unusable. I then started to think about Plexiglass type sheets that I could apply the gel to and use. I found this at the Home Depot website:
http://www.homedepot.com/Building-Materials-Acrylic-Sheets/h_d1/N-5yc1vZbrdg/R-202038067/h_d2/ProductDisplay?catalogId=10053&langId=-1&storeId=10051#product_description
48 by 96 inches is a very good size. I just measured the windows in my house and most of the windows could be covered by a 48"X48" frame; except for our front room picture window which could be covered by a 48" X 60" frame. A few of those HD Lexan sheets could be used to make up frames of appropriate sizes to shoot in a lot of places. I know that great care and handling would be needed in the setting up the gels on the Lexan sheets and in their use and storage on a shoot. I just think that this could save a lot of time over a longer shoot, and take a bit of burden off of more experienced members of the crew (Who would normally be relegated to having to do the tedious work of gelling windows which now could be done by the least experienced crew with the frames).
I think that some sheets of the Lexan with just ND gel on it could be also be very useful when shooting daytime car interiors. You could hang the sheets from a mounting system on the roof of the car and shoot out the side windows with the windows rolled down.
My concerns are:
How would you suggest making frames or a mounting system for something like this? The 48" X 96" sheets weigh 23.7 pounds, so a 48" X 48" sheet should weigh just over 11 pounds. That is not that heavy, but it is a consideration.
And.... Am I overlooking any issues with this whole line of thinking?
So, any thoughts or suggestions?