Poor Scorsese

Young-H._Lee

Well-known member
Damn, I really thought he had it. Along with a few other surprises, it almost seems that the Academy is trying to make up for the predictability seen last year
 
Re: Poor Scorsese

I haven't seen either of them, but I do feel bad for Scorsese.
 
Re: Poor Scorsese

I think that 'the aviator' is a weaker film than it could be, and 'the million dollar' is much stronger than it should.

but I didn't love either,
and I definitely hope that Scorcese gets his well deserved Oscar soon. Cause I want to see him topping the aviator.
 
Re: Poor Scorsese

I was surprised that Scorsese did not win (he seemed surprised too). Clint did an excellent job though, and I am glad that he won it.
 
Re: Poor Scorsese

Was it just my set or did the picture seem a bit soft? All my other channels looked ok but the broadcast looked soft. Commercials were sharp. Maybe had something to do with the conversion from HD to SD.
 
Re: Poor Scorsese

Yeah, Scorsese looked bummed out. He did a good job of holding it together though. The whole academy voting process is such a kiss-ass money loving corporate love-fest.
 
Re: Poor Scorsese

"The whole academy voting process is such a kiss-ass money loving corporate love-fest".

Can you explain?
 
Re: Poor Scorsese

[quote author=John Hudson link=board=Offtopic;num=1109565924;start=0#9 date=02/27/05 at 22:51:39]I can't believe I didnt get at least a nod for UNDEAD TEST; bastards.[/quote]


You needed more gratuitous nudity. ;)
 
Re: Poor Scorsese

I don't feel bad for any of them. They're making movies and they are rich. Why feel bad for them?
 
Re: Poor Scorsese

I know a couple of Academy members, and it is certainly a who-you-know club when it comes to getting a statue.

Now, obviously Scorsese is loved and respected for his work, but so are the others who are nominated. There was a groundswell of speculation in the days leading up to the show, but apparently the Academy thought there was a better picture and director in Million Dollar Baby. That's all there is to it!

On another note, it was really great to see John Dykstra (who shot the Star Wars IV trench sequence from the back of his El Camino) and Tak Miyagishima of Panavision win statues last night.

I've had the priveledge of meeting both, and they are two of the nicest and most skilled technicians you could hope to know. Also great was seeing SuperTechno Crane and Louma crane finally recognized for their contribution to creative filmmaking.

e
 
Re: Poor Scorsese

[quote author=John Hudson link=board=Offtopic;num=1109565924;start=0#9 date=02/27/05 at 22:51:39]I can't believe I didnt get at least a nod for UNDEAD TEST; bastards.[/quote]

Dude once I become a voting member, you're so in... 8)
 
Re: Poor Scorsese

I haven't see MDB, but I still think Marty got robbed. Clint said they shot MDB in 37 days!!! I'm not implying that the length of a shoot dictates the greatness of a movie, but shooting on Oscar-winning feature in such a short time really surprised me.

Plus, Aviator wins best Cinematography and Editing, I'd think that would put it very close to being the best picture.
 
Re: Poor Scorsese

Frankly, I think that's kind of silly. Cinematography, Editing and Directing are part of the package, along with writing and acting, the score and everything else. Just because 2, 3, or 4 of those parts of a film are great, doesn't mean it's the best picture of the year. The Horse Whisperer had great cinematography. I still fell asleep.

As fas as length of shoot, they were 2 very different pictures. But I think that has no bearing on the quality of a film. It should take as long as it takes to tell the story. If you get all the principal photography in a long weekend, and your film is the best picture of the year, so be it.
 
Re: Poor Scorsese

Not everyone gets to be homecoming king. The world is just so damn cruel, isn't it? I look at a guy like Martin Scorsese and I think, this guy just can't catch a break! First he has a monumental career, doing something he loves, he creates lasting works of art that will live on far longer then his body will. He amasses a significant personal fortune and continues to build a priceless film collection that is unmatched anywhere in the world. He's got enough money to do nothing for the rest of his life, actors and film technicians are hunting him down just for the chance to be included in one of his projects, and the Smithsonian Institution is begging him to be included in the will, and on top of all that...he loses the oscar to another vastly acomplished living legend.

Tragic really.

I'm tearing up right now just thinking about how sad it all is.
 
Back
Top