Matt Grunau
Adobe Demigod
Hi all.
I know one of the common problems people talk about with DV is the lack of saturation. I just shot an indoor theater production (AGAIN) where the use of colored lights was constant. I had my camera guys with their finger on the iris, always avoiding the zebras, but the footage we got back is so hard to bring to TV it's almost ridiculous. They usually stayed around -3 on the exposure by the way.
It's fine footage, no blown out whites, great color (and then some) but all within the acceptable ranges for the cameras. On computer it looks great, so it's not an oversaturation from the cameras.
But when I look at the footage with the Vectorscope (in Vegas), the colors are off the charts. I always like to use curves get a more "filmish" feel, but these colors are driving me nuts. I have applied the HSL filter, knocked down the saturation to 70, and decreased the Lum to .9.
Things are beginning to come around, but the colors are still too strong, and are overpowering the lights, no matter what I do, things are beginning to simply look muddy.
Using the Broadcast colors filter has almost no effect, other than to simply deaden some of the high end.
I am at a bit of a loss. I want my contrast to be ok, but I don't know how to maintain it without having almost any color at all.
The cameras were set to a default indoor setup (they would not allow me to get a white balance, and the color of the lights kept changing), so I had no problem get them CC'd.
Any help would be great.
This is what I get for filming another theater scene in which I have no control over the lighting. And to think a two camera shoot of over an hours worth of footage per cam and separately syncing in audio from a CD for a clean audio track for a whopping total of $175.00 for my troubles.
Before you do, don't ask. :evil:
I know one of the common problems people talk about with DV is the lack of saturation. I just shot an indoor theater production (AGAIN) where the use of colored lights was constant. I had my camera guys with their finger on the iris, always avoiding the zebras, but the footage we got back is so hard to bring to TV it's almost ridiculous. They usually stayed around -3 on the exposure by the way.
It's fine footage, no blown out whites, great color (and then some) but all within the acceptable ranges for the cameras. On computer it looks great, so it's not an oversaturation from the cameras.
But when I look at the footage with the Vectorscope (in Vegas), the colors are off the charts. I always like to use curves get a more "filmish" feel, but these colors are driving me nuts. I have applied the HSL filter, knocked down the saturation to 70, and decreased the Lum to .9.
Things are beginning to come around, but the colors are still too strong, and are overpowering the lights, no matter what I do, things are beginning to simply look muddy.
Using the Broadcast colors filter has almost no effect, other than to simply deaden some of the high end.
I am at a bit of a loss. I want my contrast to be ok, but I don't know how to maintain it without having almost any color at all.
The cameras were set to a default indoor setup (they would not allow me to get a white balance, and the color of the lights kept changing), so I had no problem get them CC'd.
Any help would be great.
This is what I get for filming another theater scene in which I have no control over the lighting. And to think a two camera shoot of over an hours worth of footage per cam and separately syncing in audio from a CD for a clean audio track for a whopping total of $175.00 for my troubles.
Before you do, don't ask. :evil: